All Activity

I did so delight in examining articles or blog posts placed here. There're outstanding possesses many practical facts. https://michelsonne.com/content/pages/1xbet_promo_code_india_today_bonus.html

This is certainly hence attractive plus artistic. I like a colorations plus whichever company may get them while in the mailbox might be smiling. https://institutocea.com/layouts/inc/?odin_deny_v_lyeghe_dostoprimechatelynosti_kotorye_nughno_uvidety.html

This is actually the kind of information I have been trying to find. Thank you for writing this information. 신용카드현금화 This is actually the kind of information I have been trying to find. Thank you for writing this information. 먹튀검증사이트

I read your blog frequently, and I just thought I’d say keep up the fantastic work! It is one of the most outstanding blogs in my opinion. boxers

Wow, excellent post. I'd like to draft like this too - taking time and real hard work to make a great article. This post has encouraged me to write some posts that I am going to write soon. hide fashion

Ever tried a strain that just melts away stress? I recently had the DVF Banana Punch and the smooth hit and happy vibes were exactly what I needed after a hectic week. Their flower is just top tier! Could that relaxation prepare me to survive a night at Five Nights At Freddy's ?

Great knowledge, do anyone mind merely reference back to it Hiddenfashion

110. How to Rethink Drinking Without "Hitting Rock Bottom" What if your relationship with alcohol doesn’t require a dramatic rock-bottom moment to change? In this episode of SetSet, I sit down with sobriety coach Martha Wright, who went from building a life around wine—professionally and personally—to questioning its role in her daily rituals. Just as I did with cannabis. Together, Martha and I explore what it means to be a “gray area drinker,” how midlife hormonal shifts impact our cravings and consumption, and how reframing our beliefs about alcohol can free us from it—without shame or labels. This conversation is rich in neuroscience, compassion, and personal insight, offering a fresh and empowering approach to alcohol use. Key Takeaways - Gray area drinking impacts 80% of alcohol consumers—many of whom don’t identify as addicts but still want change. - Willpower isn’t enough—rewiring the brain’s dopamine reward system is key to sustainable change. - Cultural myths about “normal drinking” prevent many women from questioning their habits. - Midlife hormonal shifts (like menopause) significantly impact alcohol tolerance and desire. - A “luscious sabbatical” from alcohol can reawaken sensory pleasure, curiosity, and joy. Learn more about this episode, including guests and resources on substack:https://aprilpride.substack.com/p/rethinking-alcohol-martha-wright Hosted by April Pride Sign up for April’s newsletter on Substack at https://aprilpride.substack.com/ or at getsetset.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Follow on IG: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@getsetset⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ / YouTube: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠youtube.com/@getsetset⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ / X: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@getsetset Get full access to SetSet with April Pride at aprilpride.substack.com/subscribeCatch the full episode here

Oregon officials are asking a federal appeals court to reverse a judge’s ruling that struck down a voter-approved law to require licensed marijuana businesses to enter into labor peace agreements with workers and mandate that employers remain neutral in discussions around unionization. In a filing with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit last week, attorneys for Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek (D), Attorney General Dan Rayfield (D) and Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission’s (OLCC) Dennis Doherty and Craig Prins urged a review of the “constitutional challenge” to the state law. The officials previously provided notice that they’d be contesting the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon decision back in June. After two marijuana businesses—Bubble’s Hash and Ascend Dispensary—initially filed a lawsuit in the district court challenging the implementation of Measure 119, a federal judge sided with the plaintiffs, finding that the law unconstitutionally restricts free speech and violates the federal National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Under the currently paused law, a marijuana businesses that was unable to provide proof of a labor peace agreement could have been subject a denial or revocation of their license. “The challenged law is constitutional because it does not in fact prohibit employers from expressing their views on any topic including unionization, and it therefore does not conflict either with the First Amendment’s free-speech guarantee or with any substantive protection in the NLRA,” the latest filing, first reported by Law360, says. “But even if it does affect employers’ freedom of expression, that effect is permissible under the NLRA because that federal law does not affirmatively protect employer expression at all.” “Further, to the extent the federal law does protect employer expression on unionization, it leaves room to accommodate local interests in tightly regulating the marijuana market, which Congress intended to be tightly regulated,” it continues. “And any effect on expression is also permissible under the First Amendment because that effect is limited to commercial speech and survives intermediate scrutiny.” In an order in May, the district court judge walked through various components of the legal arguments from both sides and ultimately agreed that the Oregon law is preempted by the NLRA, which is meant to provide protections for workers who want to unionize—but specifically preserves the right for “uninhibited, robust, and wide-open debate in labor disputes.” By mandating neutrality from employers in labor discussions, that constitutes a violation of the NLRA, the judge ruled. But the state is asserting that the federal circuit court “should reverse the district court’s judgment, and it should remand the case with instructions to enter judgment for defendants on the preemption and First Amendment claims.” — Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments. Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access. — On the question of whether the law violates First Amendment protections under the U.S. Constitution, the cannabis companies argued that “Measure 119 is a content-based restriction on speech that is subject to strict scrutiny, and that Defendants fail to provide a compelling government interest requiring this restriction.” Measure 119 passed with about 57 percent of the vote last November. A regional chapter of United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW)—UFCW Local 555—had submitted more than 160,000 signatures to qualify the measure for ballot placement last year. During the Oregon legislature’s 2023 session, lawmakers declined to enact a bill containing similar provisions. UFCW lobbied for that legislation, and it decided to mount a campaign to let voters decide on the issue this year after that effort failed. UFCW pressed legislators to enact a bill to codify the labor protections in 2023. And after it was effectively killed by a top House Democrat, it announced that it would be leading a recall effort to oust him. Read the federal court filing in the Oregon marijuana labor laws case below: Photo courtesy of Mike Latimer. The post Oregon Officials Ask Federal Court To Reverse Ruling That Blocked Marijuana Industry Labor Law Approved By Voters appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

The head of the Texas Department of Agriculture (TDA) is pushing back against a GOP senator’s “incorrect assertions” about the state’s regulatory compliance with federal hemp laws. But he’s also signaling that changes may be coming to measure “total THC” to determine the legality of hemp products in a way that some stakeholders worry could negatively impact the industry. After the legislature failed to pass a controversial bill to ban hemp products containing any amount of THC during two special sessions following the governor’s veto of a similar measure earlier this year, Gov. Greg Abbott (R) signed an executive order to impose certain restrictions on the market. In response, the sponsor of the ban bill, Sen. Charles Perry (R), sent a letter to TDA and the Department of State Health Services (DSHS) requesting what he desribed as “narrowly tailored” changes to the state’s hemp laws. Specifically, he said he wanted the crop and its derivatives to be tested for total THC content—including THCA—rather than just delta-9 THC, to determine legal status. Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller (R) was somewhat critical of Perry’s characterization of current state hemp laws, emphasizing in a press release on Wednesday that “since day one of Texas’ hemp program, my top priority has been making sure our farmers follow the law but still have the freedom to succeed.” “I have responded to Senator Perry’s incorrect assertions to clarify that we wrote our rules to match the [U.S. Department of Agriculture] final rule,” he said. “I’m proud to say Texas requires tough, reliable lab testing that protects consumers and keeps our program honest. There are no regulatory loopholes for hemp grown in Texas under my watch.” However, the department appeared to suggest that Perry’s request for a change in THC measurements was a policy that’s being implemented. “TDA’s hemp program is built to mirror federal law and USDA requirements. Key safeguards include: Strict Testing Standards: All hemp must be tested using post-decarboxylation methods, which measure both delta-9 THC and THC-A to ensure total THC stays below the federally mandated 0.3 percent limit.” Existing federal statute stipulates that hemp is defined as cannabis containing a “delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis.” Adding THCA to the total THC standard, as Perry has called for and as the agriculture commissioner signaled is being implemented, would be cause for concern for manufacturers and retailers of certain consumable hemp products. “Texas hemp producers need straight answers, steady rules, and a fair shake in the marketplace,” Miller said. “That’s why I’m working shoulder to shoulder with Governor Abbott, Lt. Governor Patrick, and Speaker Burrows to ensure our hemp industry continues to thrive. While also protecting our farmers, we aim to keep the bar high and continue to set the national standard for responsible hemp production and regulation.” In his letter to Perry, Miller wrote, “I appreciate the sentiment behind your message and agree there are many issues with the Hemp Program in the State of Texas.” “I do not believe the issues arise out of the Hemp rules adopted by the Texas Department of Agriculture (TDA),” he said. “Also, as you well know, the TDA regulates the industrial hemp side of the Hemp Program in Texas.” “With reference to the other definition changes requested in your letter, TDA would point out that the definitions are the same as the definitions in the adopted USDA final rule. With the exception of the word “total” in some definitions we will review. Also, TDA does not have a definition of Marijuana in our rules: however, the definition contained in your letter without the strikes is the definition in the final USDA rule. TDA is committed to requiring producers to adhere to both the USDA final rule and the State of Texas’ statutes and rules regarding the production of Hemp in Texas. TDA believes any THC-A Hemp Flower being produced is in violation of the USDA Rule and Texas’ Rule regarding Hemp production. TDA is aware there are cannabis/marijuana programs that allow for the legal production of cannabis/marijuana, and these producers may be using these programs as a ‘loophole’ to manufacture and sell their product as legal consumable ‘Hemp.'” He added that head shops “selling cannabis flower in Texas are not getting that flower from a Texas producer who is producing Hemp in compliance with the USDA Rule and the State of Texas Rule.” And in the view of TDA, “the cannabis flower is being brought in from another state or being grown in violation of the Texas Statutes and Rules.” Jonathan Miller, general counsel of the U.S. Hemp Roundtable, told Marijuana Moment that “there’s been a lot of concern from from the industry, starting with the governor’s emergency order.” “The question is, will this measurement of THCA apply to final products?” he said. “I think [the commissioner’s] focus is on hemp in the field. And if that is the case, then this announcement just states the status quo that we’ve already known. But if this is going to be taken to the next step, and final products will be held to the same total THC guideline, then it certainly would have a dramatic effect on the THCA industry.” Heather Fazio, director of the advocacy group Texas Cannabis Policy Center, told Marijuana Moment that the commissioner’s letter “makes important clarifications in his recent letter to Senator Perry.” “Hopefully this resolves the senator’s concerns about hemp being grown in Texas. The next agency we hope to hear from is DSHS, which also received a letter from Senator Perry,” she said. “DSHS indicates on their website that they are in the process of beginning another round of rulemaking to establish regulations in line with the governor’s executive order.” (Disclosure: Fazio supports Marijuana Moment’s work via monthly Patreon pledges.) — Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments. Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access. — While the governor vetoed legislation championed by Perry and the lieutenant governor to ban all hemp products containing THC, he did sign the executive order last month to set age limits to prevent youth access. The Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission (TABC) quickly adopted changes to the state’s hemp laws this week consistent with the governor’s order, making it so people under the age of 21 will no longer be permitted to purchase consumable hemp products. Meanwhile, a recent survey from a GOP pollster affiliated with President Donald Trump found that Texas Democratic and Republican voters are unified in their opposition to the hemp ban proposal. Image element courtesy of AnonMoos. The post Texas Agriculture Commissioner Pushes Back On GOP Senator’s Hemp Law Criticism, While Signaling THC Measurement Standards Change appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

Positive site, where did u come up with the information on this posting? I'm pleased I discovered it though, ill be checking back soon to find out what additional posts you include. Hiddenfashion

Federal officials are calling marijuana a “deadly” drug—touting their efforts to seize it and other illegal substances—while also warning that possessing cannabis, even for medical use, carries “serious consequences.” As President Donald Trump considers a cannabis rescheduling proposal—and after he posted a video on the health benefits of CBD—the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) are sending a conflicting message about cannabis. In a press release about an August “surge” in drug seizures that was sent out on Tuesday, DHS said that CBP, as part of its “mission to stop harmful drugs from entering the United States,” was announcing that “seizures of deadly drugs—including fentanyl, cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, and marijuana—increased substantially from July to August.” That rhetoric as it concerns marijuana departs from how most people view and compare the plant with the other listed substances that can be associated with overdose deaths. By the federal government’s own admission in the past, cannabis has not on its own caused a fatal overdose. “Cartels are increasingly desperate to keep doing business, but the Trump Administration is stopping their deadly operations,” CBP said. While looping together marijuana and drugs like fentanyl might raise eyebrows, cartel-related crime associated with cannabis has been a consistent talking point in Congress. In fact, it was the subject of a House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, & Accountability hearing last month that focused on a so-called “invasion” of Chinese and Mexican cartels via illicit cannabis operations. “Secretary Noem and the Department of Homeland Security are fulfilling President Trump’s promise to make America safe again by dismantling drug cartels and stopping the flow of deadly drugs into American communities,” DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said. “Thanks to President Trump, fewer American families will be torn apart by addiction, fewer lives will be lost to overdoses, and fewer profits will go to violent cartels.” Separately, CBP posted a reminder on social media on Tuesday that cautioned travelers against bringing cannabis across the border. “Attention, travelers! Did you know that marijuana is still a controlled substance under U.S. federal law?” it said. “This means that selling, possessing, producing, or distributing both medical and recreational cannabis is illegal!” Attention, travelers! Did you know that marijuana is still a controlled substance under U.S. federal law? This means that selling, possessing, producing, or distributing both medical and recreational cannabis is illegal! Think twice before crossing the border with marijuana.… pic.twitter.com/i0ufyMyulV — CBP (@CBP) September 30, 2025 “Think twice before crossing the border with marijuana. Doing so could lead to serious consequences like seizure, hefty fines, or even arrest!” it said. “Plus, it might affect your ability to enter the U.S. Stay informed and safe and #KnowBeforeYouGo.” The messages from DHS and CBP aren’t entirely surprising, as the agencies have maintained a staunch criminalization mentality when it comes to cannabis even amid reconsideration of the federal scheduling of marijuana and other comments from the president suggesting that there are outsized penalties for possession and use of the plant. Back in January, for example, DHS and CBP urged a federal court to dismiss a lawsuit from licensed New Mexico marijuana businesses who claimed the agencies have been unconstitutionally seizing state-regulated marijuana products and detaining industry workers at interior checkpoints. CBP’s actions against state-legal marijuana business has also received pushback from other members in Congress as well. In 2023, the agency also published an overview of issues related to the non-intoxicating cannabinoid CBD, warning that such products remain unregulated and may contain concentrations of THC that could show up in a drug test for employees. However, CBP did update its workplace policy last year, narrowing the window of employment ineligibility over past marijuana use from two years to three months. A GOP senator subsequently called on the agency to reverse that decision. Photo courtesy of Philip Steffan. The post Feds Call Marijuana A ‘Deadly’ Drug And Say Even Medical Cannabis Has ‘Serious Consequences’ appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

Three months into a major marijuana tax hike in California, a new law putting a pause on the increase has officially taken effect. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) signed the tax relief legislation from Assemblymember Matt Haney (D) late last month. Now, as of Wednesday, consumers will not be paying the increased excise tax—at least until October 2028. “We’re rolling back this cannabis tax hike so the legal market can continue to grow, consumers can access safe products, and our local communities see the benefits,” Newsom said at the time of the bill signing. Haney said that “California’s cannabis economy can bring enormous benefits to our state, but only if our legal industry is given a fair chance to compete against the untaxed and unregulated illegal market.” “AB 564 helps level the playing field,” he said. “It protects California jobs, keeps small businesses open, and ensures that our legal cannabis market can grow and thrive the way voters intended.” State officials announced in June that the cannabis excise tax rate would increase from 15 percent to 19 percent on July 1, prompting concern from industry stakeholders and consumer advocates. Newsom previously supported including a tax freeze in a budget trailer bill, but that didn’t come to fruition. Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas (D) also backed the delay, but Senate President Pro Tempore Mike McGuire (D) reportedly blocked it from the budget legislation. Before being amended in committee, the newly enacted legislation’s pause of the cannabis tax increase would have been in effect until June 30, 2030. After that, on a biennial basis, regulators would adjust the tax rate “by a percentage that will generate an amount of revenue that would have been collected pursuant to the cultivation tax imposed prior to its discontinuation, as specified, not to exceed 19 percent,” according to a summary. The Senate Appropriations Committee, however, moved to shorten the period that the reduction will be in effect, to October 2028. The new law will make it so the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA), working with the Department of Finance, will be required to “adjust the cannabis excise tax rate upon purchasers of cannabis or cannabis products” based on the “additional percentage of the gross receipts of any retail sale by a cannabis retailer that the department estimates will generate an amount of revenue equivalent to the amount that would have been collected in the previous fiscal year,” the text says. The department will need to “estimate the amount of revenue that would have been collected in the previous fiscal year pursuant to the weight-based cultivation tax” and “estimate this amount by projecting the revenue from weight-based cultivation taxes that would have been collected in the previous calendar year based on information available to the department.” “The specific goal of the cannabis excise tax rate reduction is to provide immediate tax relief to the cannabis industry,” the measure states. “The efficacy of this goal may be measured by the Legislature by the amount of gain or loss in cannabis excise tax revenues resulting from the cannabis excise tax rate reduction allowed by this act.” It also mandates that CDTFA, on or before December 1, 2026 and each subsequent year the California “submit a report to the Legislature…detailing the amount of gain or loss in cannabis excise tax revenues resulting from the cannabis excise tax rate reduction allowed by this act.” — Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments. Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access. — Meanwhile, a leading veterans group is calling on the governor to sign a bill that would streamline research on marijuana and psychedelics. The legislation from Assemblymember Christopher Ward (D) would empower the Research Advisory Panel of California (RAPC) to expedite reviews of research proposals for cannabis on marijuana and psychedelics, through January 2028. California officials are also inviting research proposals for a second round of grants under a program meant to better educate the public on the state’s marijuana law and help policymakers make informed decisions on the issue. In June, the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz) announced the recipients of over $52 million in community reinvestment grants to nonprofits and local health departments, also funded by marijuana tax revenue. That marked the seventh round of cannabis-funded California Community Reinvestment Grants (CalCRG) under the state program. Legalization in California has created a number of new grant programs aimed at addressing the consequences of marijuana prohibition and attempting to nurture a strong, well-regulated legal industry. California’s Supreme Court separately delivered a victory for the state’s marijuana program in June, rescinding a lower court ruling in a case that suggested federal prohibition could be used locally to undermine the cannabis market. The state Supreme Court ruling also came just weeks after California officials unveiled a report on the current status and future of the state’s marijuana market—with independent analysts hired by regulators concluding that the federal prohibition on cannabis that prevents interstate commerce is meaningfully bolstering the illicit market. The governor did sign a bill in 2022 that would have empowered him to enter into interstate cannabis commerce agreements with other legal states, but that power was incumbent upon federal guidance or an assessment from the state attorney general that sanctioned such activity. Meanwhile, a California Senate committee recently declined to advance a bipartisan bill that would have created a psilocybin pilot program for military veterans and former first responders. The post California Marijuana Tax Cut Officially Takes Effect, With Planned Increase Delayed Through At Least 2028 appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

Superior Place, My organization is a great believer during ad opinions regarding online websites that will let the webpage novelists recognize that they’ve put in an item worthwhile that will the online market place! 1xbet promo code today Brilliant text. A posting is affecting loads of imperative complications one's world. Most people can't be uninvolved so that you can all these complications. The following posting supplies plans plus basics. Pretty enlightening plus simple. meilleur code promo linebet Wonderful article, their quite a neat web site that you've below, carry on the excellent operate, are going to be rear. new casino no deposit bonus

“Our industry is not their piggy bank. Our wallets are not their budget overruns.” By Ben Solis, Michigan Advance The proposed new wholesale tax on marijuana products to fund road repairs in the next state budget and years down the road is much too high and would result in job losses for a booming Michigan cannabis industry, advocates and lawmakers said Tuesday as they rallied for a lower tax rate. At least two Democratic lawmakers who attended the rally—state Reps. Donavan McKinney of Detroit and Mike McFall of Hazel Park—also signaled that they were working behind the scenes to get that rate much lower before a final vote is taken. At present, both McFall and McKinney said they would vote no on the final budget if the rate remained. Michigan lawmakers reached a loose framework to fund the government last week, but it included a new 24 percent wholesale tax on products sold at dispensaries across the state. That sent the cannabis industry and their allies into a frenzy as they warned that such a tax would hamstring the industry’s growth and result in fewer jobs. On Tuesday afternoon, lawmakers were still in the throes of hammering out a final budget plan, with no clear end in sight despite signals that the government would stay open and not shut down on Wednesday when the new fiscal year begins (though by the end of the day lawmakers passed a temporary budget extension through October 8). Still, the money for the Legislature’s road funding plan had to come from somewhere, whether that was from schools—which advocates rallied against Tuesday—or from the new proposed tax on pot for potholes. Those working for or on behalf of the cannabis industry gathered for a rally on the Capitol steps in Lansing to send lawmakers and Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D), who had earlier in the year proposed a more than 30 percent tax, a clear message: Keep off their grass. “Our industry is not their piggy bank. Our wallets are not their budget overruns,” said Mike DiLaura, CCO and general counsel for House of Dank, one of many cannabis companies operating in Michigan. “It is our time, not just as an industry, but as citizens of this great state, to put our feet down and say, ‘enough is enough.’” DiLaura continued by saying that the industry has, since recreational cannabis was legalized in 2020, raised nearly $2 billion in taxes for Michigan over the last five years. “But they say it’s not enough,” DiLaura said. “When will it ever be enough?” Several other advocates and industry leaders spoke at the rally, all mentioning that even if they lost the battle to either stop the tax hike or reduce it, they would continue the fight in court or seek a full repeal of the law down the pike. The rally also featured two allies in McKinney and McFall. Both said they voted against the proposal in House Bill 4951 when it passed the House last week, noting that their communities have greatly benefited from recreational cannabis shops and associated businesses like grow operations. “Hazel Park was all in on marijuana from the very beginning. As some of you might know, we even gave Tommy Chong the key to the city at one point,” McFall said. “But what a lot of people don’t realize is how this is going to impact local municipalities. They’re talking about cutting revenue sharing, which is the money that goes back from the state. This is also going to impact that.” McFall said Hazel Park got half a million in tax dollars last year, and that money helped pay for emergency services and other amenities. McKinney said that the Eight Mile corridor is filled with marijuana shops that have transformed vacant, abandoned buildings while also delivering what he called the best marijuana in the nation. “I think Snoop Dogg said something like that,” McKinney quipped. But in all seriousness, he said that the proposal was “BS,” and the new tax rate was too high. McKinney added that he and McFall were just two of a few legislators who were willing to stand firm against the proposal, and that there was work going on behind closed doors to lower the rate if it was absolutely necessary to fund roads. “We don’t know what that number will be, but we for sure know it’s not going to be 24 percent,” McKinney said. This story was first published by Michigan Advance, and additional clarification was added by Marijuana Moment. The post Michigan Marijuana Industry Rallies Against Tax Hike Proposal That’s Advancing In The Legislature appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

That can feel great to learn these kinds of useful and also special posts on your own sites. 1xbet promo code pakistan This is often as a result exquisite and even very creative. Freezing take pleasure in that tones and even whomever makes the application with the -mail can be beaming. code promo linebet maroc her in fact awesome blog page. her realy content rich and then a this fantastic profession. i prefer this unique. casino bonus no deposit

this really is great and also meanful. this really is great website. Relating is quite beneficial factor. you might have actually aided a lot of people which check out website and offer these usefull details. 1xbet promo code free bet I’m stirred along with the surpassing and additionally preachy list of you ought to produce such smaller timing. code promo linebet algerie Thanks for the post and great tips.. even I also think that hard work is the most important area of getting success. 200 sign up bonus casino

Positive site, where did u come up with the information on this posting? I'm pleased I discovered it though, ill be checking back soon to find out what additional posts you include. bandar togel Thank you for helping people get the information they need. Great stuff as usual. Keep up the great work!!! koi toto I think this is an informative post and it is very beneficial and knowledgeable. Therefore, I would like to thank you for the endeavors that you have made in writing this article. All the content is absolutely well-researched. Thanks... bandar togel

“The integrity of a lawful election is being stolen by self-righteous politicians who beat their chests, trumpeting election integrity while quietly using you as a commission to undermine it.” By Zach Wendling, Nebraska Examiner Supporters have questioned for months whether the voter-authorized Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission would meet its October 1 deadline to grant its first licenses. The answer is no: The commission will miss that deadline by at least one week, in the wake of two resignations sought and received by Gov. Jim Pillen (R) of liquor regulators who jointly served on the medical cannabis board. The Medical Cannabis Commission confirmed the new timeline Tuesday at a meeting originally meant to approve the first cultivator licenses and move toward the first steps of a medical cannabis supply chain in the state. However, two of the five cannabis commissioners resigned Monday, both of whom served on a three-member team evaluating and scoring cultivator applications received by September 23. Now, the remaining commissioners will independently review applications by next Tuesday, when commissioners will meet to decide whether to award up to four cultivator licenses. “We would just ask for your understanding that this is a situation that none of us created in this, where we’re at right here,” Commissioner Lorelle Mueting of Gretna said Tuesday. “We would just hope you understand that we’re working through this the best that we can to make sure that we get the licenses issued in a timely manner and evaluated and issued in time.” Resignations impacted timeline Dr. Monica Oldenburg, an anesthesiologist who chairs the commission, had been on the initial evaluation team with former Commissioners Bruce Bailey of Lincoln and Kim Lowe of Kearney. The plan was to average out scores before this week’s meeting and then vote on whether to grant the first licenses. Oldenburg, a May appointee of Pillen’s, has a narrower view of what the voters passed than Bailey and Lowe, such as on smoking. Bailey had the most permissive view of voters’ wishes. Under a state law passed by about 67 percent of voters last November, with majority support in 46 of 49 legislative districts, the commission needed to, “No later than October 1, 2025, begin granting registrations to applicants that meet eligibility standards and other requirements established by the commission.” The guidelines were established by an early July 1 deadline set by voters. Bailey and Lowe resigned Monday, tossing a major wrench into whether the commission would meet its Wednesday licensing deadline. Pillen’s request followed the unsealing last week of federal corruption charges against former Liquor Control Commission Executive Director Hobert “Hobie” Rupe. Rupe has pleaded not guilty. The indictment did not implicate any member of the Liquor Control Commission. While Pillen has rejected all of the pending Liquor Control Commission regulatory changes proposed under the former director, his staff has confirmed that he has no plans to shelve medical cannabis regulations. Bailey had chaired the Liquor Control Commission and served since 2014. Lowe had served on that commission since 2021. Retired Judge J. Michael Coffey joined the commission in June, a vacancy created after Pillen had previously requested the resignation of a third commissioner, Harry Hoch Jr., in May. Oldenburg, Mueting and Coffey will review applications on metrics that have not been publicly released. Passing applicants need to average at least 70 out of 100. Applications were entered into a “lottery” to randomly order submissions. Pillen opposes the legalization of recreational marijuana and has said Coffey, Mueting and Oldenburg—all his appointees—will keep Nebraska’s medical cannabis system carefully regulated. He will appoint two commissioners to succeed Bailey and Lowe. Licensing lawsuit likely The commission also faces a potential legal threat from Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers (R). His office has threatened to sue the commission once the first licenses are issued. “This office has long held that any attempt to license entities to dispense marijuana in Nebraska violates the federal ban [on marijuana],” then-acting Deputy Solicitor General Zach Pohlman testified at a March legislative hearing. “If the Medical Cannabis Commission tries to do so, the Attorney General’s Office will challenge that action as preempted and unenforceable.” The office has repeated the stance multiple times, including in a separate citizen-led lawsuit seeking to overturn the voter-passed laws, in which Hilgers and Pohlman say it should be the AG’s Office, not a citizen, to challenge the laws’ constitutionality. A spokesperson for Hilgers declined to confirm last week whether this remained the position of the Attorney General’s Office. A Pillen spokesperson, when asked last week whether the governor supported Hilgers’s efforts, directed questions to the AG’s Office. A separate voter-passed law authorizes anyone with a health care practitioner’s recommendation to possess up to 5 ounces of medical cannabis in Nebraska. It passed with 71 percent voter support last November, including majority support in every legislative district. Nebraska became the 39th state to authorize a medical cannabis program. ‘We can get started today’ Troy Burgess, one of the cultivator applicants, said Tuesday that once a cultivator begins growing marijuana, it could be five months before anything is sent to a product manufacturer (another license type) and another 4-6 weeks before it is ready for sale at a dispensary (another license type). “These patients need relief. We need to get it to them,” Burgess told the commission. “We can get started today.” The proposed regulations the commission is considering would cap the four licensed cultivators to no more than 1,250 flowering plants each at any one time. With two expected harvests in the year, that’s up to 10,000 harvestable plants, if all plants are grown successfully and are contaminant-free. The commission is anticipating an initial program to support about 20,000 patients. All products would need to meet strict testing requirements as set by the commission. A public hearing on the proposed regulations is set for 1 p.m. on October 15 at the Nebraska State Office Building. The hearing could last up to three hours, with testifiers limited to two or three minutes apiece. Written comments can be submitted up to 11:59 p.m. on October 15 by mail to the Nebraska Medical Commission, PO Box 95046, Lincoln, NE 68509-5046; by fax at 402-471-2814 or by email to mcc.contact@nebraska.gov. ‘Integrity’ Dominic Gillen of Bellevue, who has worked with advocates of medical cannabis for more than a decade in Nebraska, spoke to the commission Tuesday about “integrity” and said the full weight of voter trust is on commissioners, not politicians behind the curtain “pulling the strings.” “The integrity of a lawful election is being stolen by self-righteous politicians who beat their chests, trumpeting election integrity while quietly using you as a commission to undermine it,” Gillen said. Many Nebraskans again urged the commission to approve of smoking, vaping and raw flower sales, which its proposed regulations reject. Angelica Marsaglia told commissioners they needed to implement the law, not rewrite it. “That exceeds your authority, undermines the will of the voters and is unlawful,” Marsaglia said. Gillen said Bailey was guilty of “honoring his commitment to the voters” and “should be hailed as a hero” for standing up for voters, such as pushing for more cultivators and a higher plant cap. “The politicians have made their heartless choice,” Gillen said. “You, on the other hand, still have one.” The Medical Cannabis Commission will meet next at 2 p.m. October 7 in Lincoln. What would the latest medical cannabis regulations mean? If finalized, the state’s medical cannabis regulations would license up to four cultivators, four product manufacturers, 12 dispensaries and 12 transporters. The guidelines would also establish a “Recommending Health Care Practitioner Directory” and also make Nebraska’s program essentially a low-THC variety. Under the regulations, patients or caregivers could purchase up to 5 ounces of medical cannabis in a 30-day period, which is about 142 grams. Of that, patients could purchase no more than 5 grams of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) from the same dispensary within 90 days. Delta-9 THC is the part of cannabis most associated with a “high.” The regulations would allow no more than 12 medical cannabis dispensaries statewide, arranged by judicial district. That could mean one dispensary in Douglas County (584,526 residents), Lancaster County (322,608 residents), Sarpy/Cass Counties (217,202 residents) and Buffalo/Hall Counties (112,979 residents), according to 2020 census data. Dispensaries would not be able to sell smoking or vaping products or edibles of any kind. Oral tablets with a “thin layer” of flavoring to make the products easier to swallow could be sold. Under current law, a patient or qualified caregiver with a recommendation from any health care practitioner can legally possess up to 5 ounces of medical cannabis, in any form. But no licenses have yet been issued, so cannabis can’t legally be purchased in Nebraska yet. The latest set of emergency regulations ends December 7. Commissioners say that set of regulations can be extended for one additional 90-day period. Once the Medical Cannabis Commission approves a more permanent set of regulations, commissioners will send the regulations to Attorney General Mike Hilgers (R) for legal review and Gov. Jim Pillen (R) for final approval. This story was first published by Nebraska Examiner. Photo courtesy of Brian Shamblen. The post Nebraska Officials Miss Medical Marijuana Licensing Deadline As Regulators Resign appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

Cheers pertaining to delivering the latest changes in connection with worry, My spouse and i expect go through additional. 1xbet promo code free bet Wonderful article, their quite a neat web site that you've below, carry on the excellent operate, are going to be rear. code promo linebet maroc This can be a excellent post, Many thanks with regard to providing me personally these details. Maintain publishing. live casino bonus

Cheap content, With thanks just for stating This approach skills. Wonderfully developed page, only if all of the the blogosphere obtainable the equivalent degree content and articles simply because, websites became a more desirable space. Delight continue! 1xbet promo code free bet Genuinely reliable, wonderful, fact-filled data below. Your current blogposts Do not ever let down, knowning that surely holds true below also. Anyone often create a unique go through. Could you explain to I am just satisfied?: )#) Carry on the fantastic content. code promo linebet casino I simply reckoned it is an outline to share in case other companies was first experiencing difficulty looking for still Now i'm a small amount of doubting generally if i here's permitted to use artists and additionally explains relating to right. 100 free bonus casino no deposit philippines

Massachusetts lawmakers have approved a bill to establish a pilot program for the regulated therapeutic use of psychedelics. And two committees have separately held hearings to discuss additional psilocybin-related measures. Less than two weeks after advancing out of the legislature’s Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use and Recovery Hearing, the pilot program legislation from Sen. Cindy Friedman (D) moved through the Joint Committee on Health Care Financing on Tuesday with a “do pass” recommendation. The bill, S.1400, is light on specifics, leaving many details of the pilot program up to regulators with the Department of Public Health (DPH). But in general, it calls for a “pilot program to allow for the monitored mental health care of clinically appropriate patients using psychedelic materials.” It would involve the “on-site administration by a multi-disciplinary care team in a supervised licensed mental health clinic setting.” DPH could only issue licenses for up to three health facilities to administer and study the psychedelics in the state. They would be tasked with “establishing the best and safest clinical practices for psychedelic mental health treatment programs in the commonwealth and for the purposes of collecting patient outcomes data regarding the benefits of psychedelic pharmacotherapy.” “Eligible pilot program organizations must exclusively focus operations and treatment on mental health and cannot be subsidiaries, affiliates or members of cannabis industry organizations, psychedelic molecule development companies or pharmaceutical companies,” the bill text states. The department would be required to develop rules for the program, including setting standards for people to apply to participate, patient assessments and ongoing monitoring, clinical staffing and the administration of psychedelic medicines. “All pilot program participant organizations must track patient care outcomes data related to the identification, diagnosis and psychedelic treatment of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and substance use disorder,” it says. “These data sets must be shared with the department to assist in the refinement of best clinical protocols and final regulatory frameworks for the safe use of psychedelic material in Massachusetts.” Jamie Morey, executive director and co-founder of the advocacy group Mass Healing said the bill’s advancement “brings the promise of healing one step closer for Massachusetts residents suffering from trauma, depression, and other treatment-resistant conditions.” “We thank Senator Friedman and the committee for seeing the desperate need for new treatment options to help reduce deaths of despair and taking bold action to put Massachusetts at the forefront of a mental health revolution that will save countless lives,” she said. The bill, as well as a separate measure to provide a more limited pilot program for psilocybin therapy alone, will also be the focus of a hearing on November 10 before the Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use and Recovery. At separate hearings on Monday, lawmakers considered a psilocybin pilot program proposal from Rep. Lindsay Sabadosa (D), as well as a broader measure to legalize and regulate psilocybin for adults that’s being sponsored by Rep. Patrick Kearney (D). Members of the Joint Committee on Revenue took up the legalization measure, while the Joint Committee on Public Health discussed the psilocybin pilot program proposal. Members in both panels took testimony from experts about the therapeutic potential of the psychedelic and ramifications of criminalization, but did not act on the bills. Graham Moore, educational director for Mass Healing, told the revenue panel that “blanket prohibition can actually cause more harm than good.” “The largest preventable cause of death in this state is tobacco, and psilocybin has been shown to help people break that addiction among many other improvements to behavioral health,” he said. Joe McKay of Clusterbusters told lawmakers about how using psilocybin has helped to manage cluster headache condition he began experiencing after 9/11, when he was one of many firefighters who responded to the World Trade Center attack in New York City. “I would take a low dose a few times a year to keep the attacks away. And during one experience, I had this 10,000-foot view of my life and I realized how I had changed since 9/11 and that I was living with PTSD. I also realized that I was taking the painkillers to numb the emotional pain and not the physical,” he said. “I sought out help from an underground therapist, and today I no longer drink alcohol and I have not taken a painkiller since,” McKay said. “And I can honestly say that psilocybin healed me, both physically and mentally.” While multiple cities across Massachusetts have enacted local psychedelics decriminalization initiatives, voters rejected a statewide ballot measure last year that would have legalized substances such as psilocybin, ibogaine and DMT for adults. Ahead of that vote, the governor signed a military veterans-focused bill that includes provisions to create a psychedelics working group to study and make recommendations about the potential therapeutic benefits of substances like psilocybin and MDMA. Meanwhile, the legislature’s Joint Committee on the Judiciary in July held a hearing on four of 12 psychedelics-related bills that were filed for this session, with the Massachusetts Psychiatric Society (MPS) endorsing one that would decriminalize certain entheogenic substances. — Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments. Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access. — Separately in Massachusetts, the state attorney general recently certified and prepared summaries for dozens of proposed 2026 ballot initiatives—including a pair that would roll back adult-use marijuana legalization in the state. Regulators are also working to finalize rules to allow for a new cannabis consumption lounge license type, which they hope to complete soon. The legislature’s Joint Committee on Cannabis Policy last month approved bills to provide employment protections for marijuana consumers and expand the state’s medical cannabis program, in part by adding post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and opioid use disorder to the list of qualifying conditions. State lawmakers have also been considering setting tighter restrictions on intoxicating hemp-derived products and a plan to allow individual entities to control a larger number of cannabis establishments. Photo elements courtesy of carlosemmaskype and Apollo. The post Massachusetts Lawmakers Advance Psychedelics Pilot Program Bill As Committees Weigh Additional Psilocybin Measures appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

I got lost in a small mountain town during a hiking trip and ended up meeting some quirky locals who completely changed my plans. Sharing this feels unpredictable, almost like trying to survive Level Devil where every twist tests your patience.

Wow, cool post. I’d like to write like this too – taking time and real hard work to make a great article… but I put things off too much and never seem to get started. Thanks though. link bolahit Thanks for your insight for your fantastic posting. I’m glad I have taken the time to see this. bandar slot This is the type of information I’ve long been trying to find. Thank you for writing this information. 오피스타 Fantastic blog! Do you have any tips and hints for aspiring writers? I’m planning to start my own website soon but I’m a little lost on everything. Would you propose starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a paid option? There are so many options out there that I’m completely overwhelmed .. Any suggestions? Many thanks! toto togel Cool stuff you have got and you keep update all of us. iosbet daftar

Very useful info. Hope to see more posts soon!. situs bolahit Thank you for very usefull information.. bandar slot gacor This is a brilliant blog! I'm very happy with the comments!.. 오피스타 I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. koi toto Awesome article! I want people to know just how good this information is in your article. It’s interesting, compelling content. Your views are much like my own concerning this subject. iosbet login