All Activity

Delaware’s governor has signed a bill to let terminally ill patients use medical cannabis in hospitals. Both the Senate and the House of Representatives had unanimously passed the marijuana legislation from Sen. Marie Pinkney (D) this session, and Gov. Matt Meyer (D) signed it into law on Thursday. Under the reform, which is set to take effect one year after its enactment, patients and their caregivers will be responsible for acquiring and administering medical marijuana, and it will need to be stored securely at all times in a locked container. Smoking or vaping of medical cannabis will be prohibited, so patients will need to consume it via other methods. Healthcare facility officials will need to see a copy of patients’ state medical marijuana registry ID cards, and they will be required to note their use of the drug in medical records. They will also need to “develop and disseminate written policies and procedures for the use of medical marijuana within the health care facility.” Facilities will be able to prohibit medical marijuana use if they determine that such use would have an “adverse impact on the medical care and treatment of the patient or is otherwise contraindicated.” They will also be able to suspend permission to use cannabis if a federal agency such as the U.S. Department of Justice or Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services takes an enforcement action against such use or “issues a rule, guidance, or otherwise provides notification to health care facilities that expressly prohibits the use of medical marijuana in health care facilities.” The right to use medical cannabis under the bill, SB 226, will not apply to patients who are in the emergency department. — Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments. Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access. — Meanwhile in Delaware, the Senate in January voted to override the governor’s veto of a bill that would prevent local governments from imposing onerous zoning restrictions that make it more challenging for marijuana businesses to operate in their jurisdictions. The House has yet to take up an override vote. Lawmakers this session are also considering several competing bills to regulate hemp-derived THC products. Delaware’s adult-use cannabis market launched last August, with the governor touting the state’s first “successful” weekend of adult-use cannabis sales, with total purchases for medical and recreational marijuana totaling nearly $1 million—and compliance checks demonstrating that the regulated market is operating as intended under the law. The launch of Delaware’s legal market came about two years after marijuana legalization was enacted into law under former Gov. John Carney (D). Ahead of the sales roll-out, the governor last July toured one of the state’s cannabis cultivation facilities, praising the quality of marijuana that’s being produced, which he said will be the “French wine of weed.” The launch of the legal market came with some controversy, however, with critics alleging that allowing medical operators to start adult-use sales ahead of other license applicants is unfair. Dozens of other would-be retailers that have either already received licenses or are still awaiting issuance will need to wait for further regulatory approvals until they can open their doors—a situation that’s frustrated some advocates. Two lawmakers who led the push to legalize marijuana sought input from consumers and businesses about the market launch. Sen. Trey Paradee (D), the sponsor of SB 75, and House Majority Whip Rep. Ed Osienski (D)—the primary sponsor of the state’s 2023 legalization bills—put out an online form last year for residents to share thoughts and feedback about the cannabis program anonymously. Separately, a Delaware House committee in January approved a bill to decriminalize public consumption of marijuana. While certain legal marijuana states like Colorado and Ohio still impose criminal penalties for public cannabis use, Delaware stands out as especially punitive, with a maximum penalty that carries the risk of jail time in addition to a fine. The post Delaware Governor Signs Bill Allowing Medical Marijuana Use In Hospitals By Terminally Ill Patients appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

Whether you're in Noida for a visit or residing nearby, you can check out verified Escort Noida profiles and select based on your needs. Our platform emphasizes privacy, transparent communication, and seamless coordination to guarantee an effortless experience. By having frequently updated availability and straightforward access, discovering an appropriate choice becomes easy and convenient.

Identifying a reputable Escort in Delhi can be accomplished if you know how to identify the inherent signs of legitimacy within the providers, such as communication style, attention to detail, and their willingness to accommodate your special requests.

Rescheduling “might affect a VA provider’s ability to refer VA patients to State medical cannabis treatment programs,” one document obtained through FOIA says. By Doc Laing, Veterans Action Council The Trump administration’s move to federally reschedule medical cannabis could meaningfully increase military veterans’ ability to legally access it with the aid of U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) doctors, newly obtained documents via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) show—even if reclassification won’t change everything about how veterans who use cannabis receive care through VA providers. In response to a FOIA request filed by the Veterans Action Council (VAC), VA released more than 1,500 pages of internal records that offer a rare view into how VA’s Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has been implementing the department’s current cannabis policy, known as VHA Directive 1315, across its national system—as well as what might and might not change as rescheduling unfolds. This article is the first in a multi-part series focusing on what is working and what isn’t inside VA. While there has been a deliberate effort to ensure clinicians and veterans understand and follow the department’s cannabis policy as it stands today, officials have also dropped the ball in many ways. The newly unveiled records show a consistent, if insufficient, effort to educate providers and align care with federal policy while respecting veterans’ rights. A Clear Policy Reinforced Across The System Across multiple communications obtained via FOIA, Directive 1315 is referenced repeatedly as both a foundational document and an operational guide. It is referenced in cover letters, internal messages and across training materials. In total, it appears between six and ten times across the released records, depending on how the educational materials are counted. This level of repetition signals more than just awareness. It shows institutional reinforcement. An internal communication from the VHA Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, for example, states clearly that providers are required to enable discussion of cannabis use and the evidence both for and against with their patients. That statement reflects the directive’s core principle: Engagement is required. Silence is no longer acceptable. The Veterans Behind The Policy This progress is the result of sustained advocacy by veterans. Among the most important contributors is Michael Krawitz. Beginning in the early 2000s, Krawitz and other veterans worked to change how VA approached cannabis. Their efforts led to the establishment of a formal policy in 2010 that confirmed veterans would not be denied care solely for participating in state-approved cannabis programs. Directive 1315 is built on that foundation. This reflects years of persistence by veterans who demanded recognition and fairness within a biased system. VAC recognizes and thanks Krawitz and other advocates for this work. Their efforts helped shift the culture from prohibition to clinical engagement. The contrast with earlier decades is stark. In the 1990s, VAC member Etienne Fontan was removed from four VA hospitals by security, simply for mentioning his medical cannabis use. At that time, even acknowledging cannabis could result in exclusion from care. The conversation itself was treated as a violation. Back then, providers would simply wave their hand and exclaim that “marijuana is illegal under federal law, so I can’t talk about it.” Today, providers are expected to have that conversation. That reflects real progress and sets a clear expectation. No veteran patient should ever again be treated that way by their healthcare system. Educating Providers At The Front Line—And Analyzing What Rescheduling’s Impact Might Be The FOIA release includes a cannabis provider education packet and supporting materials that translate Directive 1315 into clinical practice. These materials consistently emphasize several key points: Veterans who participate in state-approved cannabis programs must not be denied care. Those providers are expected to discuss and document cannabis use. Under current policy, clinicians may not currently ‘recommend cannabis’ or certify veterans for state programs—but that could change under the move to transfer cannabis from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act to Schedule III. The reform “might affect a VA provider’s ability to refer VA patients to State medical cannabis treatment programs,” one document obtained through FOIA says. The standard of care would remain unchanged, however. Treatment plans must be protected, especially regarding mental health, unless strong evidence supports change. Together, the documents detail practical instructions for clinicians. The cannabis directive is being taught in a way that enables providers to apply it directly in patient care. The consistency of the message is notable. The policy is not hidden. It is actively communicated and reinforced across the system. One problem, however, is that veterans aren’t shown administrative policy memos. So despite VA posting a video about 12 years after the policy launched, many veterans still do not know Directive 1315 even exists, so they fear a punitive response for disclosing their use of cannabis—even though such punitive actions would be clearly against policy and unethical. A second problem is that clinicians face a barrage of anti-drug and drug misuse-focused memos that seem to contradict and obscure the existence of and intent of the cannabis directive. Further, we can see no evidence within the documents or elsewhere of continuing medical education cannabis university courses being propagated within the system, and we see no actions at the facility level to educate staff about this cannabis policy, which explains why the experiences of our veterans seem to vary so wildly from clinic to clinic, facility to facility. Stability As Policy Evolves Directive 1315 speaks to reality under cannabis’s longtime Schedule I status, so the memos VAC obtained via FOIA warn that veterans face arrest for possessing it on federal property. However, they also look ahead to how federal rescheduling may change some things at VA. The prohibition against doctors recommending cannabis will need to be revised under Schedule III, for example, as noted above. But guidance from the Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention makes it clear that even under such rescheduling, the core approach of Directive 1315 will remain the same. Providers will still be expected to discuss and document cannabis use. The standard of care for mental health conditions will not change automatically. Any change to provider authority, such as referrals to state programs, would require separate legal and policy review. This reflects a commitment to stability. VHA is not reacting to speculation. It is maintaining a consistent framework within the standard of care and in line with best clinical practice. Following The Law While Supporting Veterans Directive 1315 operates within a complex legal environment. Cannabis remains federally illegal, while many states have legalized medical use. The directive creates a structure that complies with federal law while respecting veterans’ access to care. The FOIA responses confirm that this structure is being taken seriously. Facilities are guided by existing policies for conduct on VA property, while Directive 1315 provides a clear framework for clinical interaction. The core protections are straightforward. Access to care is not conditional on cannabis use. Clinical conversations are encouraged. Documentation supports continuity of care. These principles reflect a system that balances legal requirements with clinical responsibility. A Foundation Worth Recognizing This FOIA release shows that there is also progress worth recognizing. VHA is educating its providers. It is reinforcing Directive 1315 across multiple channels. It is maintaining a consistent message amid policy uncertainty. There is much more work to do, however, and future articles in this series will examine areas that need improvement. But the foundation is clear. Directive 1315 is being taught. It is being referenced. It is being followed. For veterans navigating both healthcare and cannabis policy, that consistency matters. It represents not only compliance with the law but a solid step toward restoring trust. The Veterans Action Council has long called for transparency and accountability within VA. We look forward to a good working relationship with VA and to our shared interest in ensuring that veterans have the best possible health outcomes. Doc Laing is an Army veteran, Colorado advocate and dedicated member of the Veterans Action Council who has consistently worked to elevate the voices and needs of veterans within the cannabis reform movement. Drawing from lived experience, his writing reflects a grounded perspective on veterans’ healthcare, personal freedom and the importance of honest conversations around cannabis policy and access. The post VA Documents Show How Veterans’ Cannabis Access Could Expand—And What Will Stay The Same—Under Rescheduling (Op-Ed) appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well. Thanks... AK 게임 총판모집

In our Escort Service in Delhi escort, you can find your escort's for "working late" visits. Can't get out of the office at night? Just give us a call and she will bring the coffee, join you and help you to relax in the executive washroom or on the couch. There's no work stress whatsoever. Hauz Khas Escorts Escorts in Vaishali Indirapuram Escorts Service Escorts Service Mayur Vihar Escorts Service in Shahdara

What a fantabulous post this has been. Never seen this kind of useful post. I am grateful to you and expect more number of posts like these. Thank you very much. montessori lernturm

Medicare CBD lawsuit dismissed; GOP reps want marijuana testing “carve-out” for rescheduling; Poll: VA gov veto unpopular; AK cannabis record sealing Subscribe to receive Marijuana Moment’s newsletter in your inbox every weekday morning. It’s the best way to make sure you know which cannabis stories are shaping the day. Get our daily newsletter. Email address: Leave this field empty if you're human: Your support makes Marijuana Moment possible… Your good deed for the day: donate to an independent publisher like Marijuana Moment and ensure that as many voters as possible have access to the most in-depth cannabis reporting out there. Support our work at https://www.patreon.com/marijuanamoment / TOP THINGS TO KNOW A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit from anti-marijuana groups and a cannabis-focused biopharmaceutical corporation that sought to block a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services plan to cover hemp products for eligible patients. A coalition of 29 Democratic House and Senate members sent a letter urging President Donald Trump to use his power to commute the sentences of people still serving time in federal prison for marijuana as a follow-up to the administration’s cannabis rescheduling move. Reps. Andy Harris (R-MD) and Pete Sessions (R-TX) joined with an anti-marijuana group and a drug testing industry association to push for passage of a “safety carve-out” to ensure that transportation workers can still be tested and punished for cannabis use even after rescheduling. A new poll shows that Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger’s (D) veto of legislation to legalize recreational marijuana sales is overwhelmingly unpopular with voters—and that there’s strong support across party lines for launching a cannabis market sooner than later. Alaska lawmakers sent Gov. Mike Dunleavy (R) a package of criminal justice legislation including provisions to let people keep marijuana conviction records confidential, subject to certain limitations. The Department of Transportation adopted a drug testing rule that will require truck drivers and other federally regulated workers to undergo “directly observed” urine collection because no saliva testing labs have yet been certified. The Alabama State Committee of Public Health voted to object to federal marijuana rescheduling in order to give officials more time to prepare for an automatic reclassification of cannabis under state law triggered by the Trump administration’s move. The New Jersey Senate Judiciary Committee approved a bill to allow liquor stores to sell large-sized hemp THC beverages and to let medical cannabis dispensaries add recreational sales without needing local approval. Delaware lawmakers are weighing four different bills to regulate hemp THC products as the end of the legislative session nears. / FEDERAL The National Institute on Drug Abuse posted notices of intent to award a contract to produce and distribute drugs for research. Former Rep. Tim Murphy (R-PA) called marijuana “one of the biggest scourges going in this country” and claimed that “states are going to lose money” from legalization due to the costs associated with use, adding that “there’s no real medical uses.” / STATES Texas Democratic lieutenant governor candidate Marcos Vélez discussed his support for legalizing marijuana. California’s attorney general announced the arrest of a “conman” who allegedly “defrauded investors out of more than half a million dollars through a fake cannabis investment scheme.” Minnesota lawmakers declined to enact legislation to create a psilocybin therapy program that had passed the House of Representatives. An Illinois representative discussed his cannabis reform legislation and the impact of federal marijuana rescheduling on the state. Colorado regulators are being sued by marijuana businesses that claim the state owes millions of dollars in tax refunds because they allegedly allowed so many sham transactions to proliferate that it undermined sales by licensed operators. Massachusetts regulators are moving to begin auditing state THC potency on marijuana product labels. Michigan cannabis regulators are inviting people to join a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Workgroup. The New York Cannabis Control Board will meet on Friday. / INTERNATIONAL Guyana’s agriculture minister discussed moves toward developing a hemp industry in the country. / SCIENCE & HEALTH A study found that “cannabis alone and cannabis with the lower dose of alcohol did not reliably impact performance on behavioral tests (ie, SFSTs), commonly used by law enforcement to detect impaired drivers.” / ADVOCACY, OPINION & ANALYSIS The Pennsylvania Democratic Party tweeted that Republican gubernatorial nominee “Stacy Garrity made clear that marijuana legalization is ‘never going to pass’ if she’s governor, and her running mate, Jason Richey, doubled down that it would be ‘catastrophic.’ Garrity and Richey are in lockstep on their extreme, toxic agenda that will hold Pennsylvania back — and that’s why we will elect Democrats up and down the ballot to finally get this done.” / BUSINESS Decibel Cannabis Company Inc. reported quarterly net revenue of C$29.8 million and a loss and comprehensive loss of C$2.2 million. / CULTURE Scary Movie 6 is being promoted with a bong-shaped popcorn bucket. Make sure to subscribe to get Marijuana Moment’s daily dispatch in your inbox. Get our daily newsletter. Email address: Leave this field empty if you're human: The post Lawmakers push Trump to pardon cannabis prisoners (Newsletter: May 25, 2026) appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

I admire this article for the well-researched content and excellent wording. I got so involved in this material that I couldn’t stop reading. I am impressed with your work and skill. Thank you so much. torre de aprendizaje para niños

It's great to see Erica recognized! Her dedication to fostering a supportive environment, whether it's through online communities like Omegle back in the day or more structured groups now, really shines through. Her passion for connecting people always makes a positive impact.

“Every month that passes without certified oral fluid testing is another month when federal workers with paruresis face anxiety, discrimination, and career barriers.” By Kastalia Medrano, Filter The Department of Transportation will require “directly observed” urine drug testing in federal workplace situations where saliva testing has been called for, but is not possible. The clarification to DOT drug and alcohol testing procedures is the latest development in the trucking industry’s years-long push for oral fluid testing as an alternative to urine testing. The new rule was published in the Federal Register on May 11, and will take effect June 10. Truck drivers, who are subject to an inordinate number of federal regulations, don’t choose their method of drug-testing—their DOT-regulated employers do. The campaign for implementation of oral fluid testing has been led by the American Trucking Association (ATA), which argues that it’s necessary to “keep impaired drivers off the road and uphold the trucking industry’s commitment to safety.” The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) approved lab-based oral fluid testing in 2019, and DOT finalized its own regulations authorizing employers to choose this as an alternative to urine testing in 2023. But actual implementation requires at least two laboratories that are Food and Drug Administration-approved to process the tests—one for the initial analysis and another to confirm the results. Currently there are zero. Oral fluid testing appeals to many employers for a few reasons, one being the efficacy in detecting recent drug use—within the past couple of hours—compared to urine drug testing. Though the trucking industry has become the public face of the campaign, the regulations also affect federal workers in the commercial aviation, rail, public transit and pipeline sectors. One of the primary concerns expressed by the trucking industry has been that urine drug screens are not witnessed, and therefore easier to circumvent oral fluid testing. Another concern revolves around paruresis, more commonly known as “shy bladder” syndrome—if a driver is unable to produce urine when required to, they’re held for a three-hour waiting period, which obviously impacts their arrival time at their destination. And if they still can’t produce urine during that period, it’s considered a refusal to take the test and they’re removed from their duties. To return, they must “pass” a urine test that is witnessed by a same-gender observer. The new DOT rule also updates its prevailing terminology by replacing the word “gender” with the word “sex” in accordance with President Donald Trump’s January 2025 executive order, “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.” “Every month that passes without certified oral fluid testing is another month when federal workers with paruresis face anxiety, discrimination, and career barriers,” Dr. Steven Soifer, co-founder of the International Paruresis Association, stated in March. “We’ve been working on this issue since our founding [30 years ago]. Our members ask the same question every day: When will the federal government complete the work it already approved?” In April, at the request of the ATA, six members of Congress wrote to Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. citing FDA regulatory barriers as the reason no United States labs are certified to process oral fluid tests. They cited an analysis by Quest Diagnostics that showed “substituted” urine specimens increased 370 percent from 2022 to 2023. Quest has a proprietary lab-based oral fluid collection method, Quantisal™, and as such has been an avid supporter of the campaign. On May 1, the FDA published a notice of its intent to consider revising the requirements that pertain to toxicology testing. That same day SAMHSA published a list of currently certified labs, which presumably will be updated in the future but for the moment simply confirms that there aren’t any. However HHS ultimately handles oral fluid testing will set the stage for what happens with hair follicle testing. The department was directed to create guidelines for hair testing in 2015, but has not yet done so. This article was originally published by Filter, an online magazine covering drug use, drug policy and human rights through a harm reduction lens. Follow Filter on Bluesky, X or Facebook, and sign up for its newsletter. The post Federal Drug Testing Rule Will Require ‘Directly Observed’ Urine Collection From Truck Drivers appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

Interesting discussion about cannabis culture, community, and women-led initiatives in the industry. Podcasts like this open up important conversations and diverse perspectives. Thanks for sharing! Follow Kora Live for more trending stories and podcast highlights.

“I know these products are safe. I know they are tested, because if they weren’t, I wouldn’t carry them in my stores.” By Brianna Hill, Spotlight Delaware With just over a month left in Delaware’s legislative session, lawmakers are pushing competing legislation to regulate the hemp-derived THC products that have become widely available outside of the state’s licensed marijuana market. The intoxicating products, including gummies, vapes and infused beverages, are part of a fast-growing industry that smoke shop owners and licensed marijuana retailers want to be able to sell. Now, four bills before lawmakers offer different paths to regulate them. One would fold many intoxicating hemp products into the state’s regulated marijuana industry, meaning they could only be sold at licensed marijuana stores. Another would create a separate regulatory structure for hemp retailers. And a third would support the second bill by clarifying that certain THC products should not be treated as marijuana. The fourth would regulate THC-infused beverages through a framework that would allow them to be sold at liquor stores or recreational marijuana retailers. THC-infused products have become increasingly popular since the passage of the 2018 U.S. Farm Bill, which created a loophole allowing for the legal commercial and retail sale of hemp-derived substances. Hemp is a non-intoxicating cannabis plant that contains 0.3 percent or less THC by dry weight. But entrepreneurial hemp farmers have figured out a way to chemically convert the non-intoxicating compound cannabidiol (CBD) from hemp into intoxicating substances like delta-9 and delta-8 THC. It’s technically legal as long as the hemp at time of harvest stays below legal thresholds. Since then, hemp-derived THC products have become widely available at retailers, such as smoke shops, gas stations and bodegas, even as marijuana has been strictly regulated. Critics have called that the hemp loophole. Those hemp retailers say some of the newly proposed restrictions could push them out of business. But licensed marijuana operators and state regulators argue that those businesses are selling similar intoxicating products without the same rules for testing, labeling, taxation, age restrictions, and in-state cultivation. ‘It’s THC, it’s not hemp. It’s marijuana.’ In late April, Rep. Nnamdi Chukwuocha (D-Wilmington) introduced House Bill 395, which would move hemp products into Delaware’s licensed marijuana system. The bill would also expand the definition of THC to include other variations of the compound and set a stricter 0.4 milligram total THC limit for finished products. That threshold mirrors federal language Congress passed last fall to close the hemp loophole, though the federal changes are not set to take effect until November. Chukwuocha said his goal is to align Delaware with the federal standard while protecting consumers and limiting access to minors. “At its core, this bill is about public safety,” he said during a House Health & Human Development Committee meeting last week. To date, the Delaware Division of Tobacco and Alcohol Enforcement has sent 70 cease-and-desist letters to over 60 businesses selling THC products, according to DATE spokesman Lt. Michael Loiseau. The figure does not include letters that have been sent out by municipalities to different businesses. Under Chukwuocha’s bill, businesses outside Delaware’s marijuana industry could still sell non-intoxicating hemp products, such as CBD products, which are commonly marketed for relaxation, inflammation, and other wellness uses. But violations involving intoxicating products would generally be treated as a Class A misdemeanor and could rise to a Class G felony in certain cases, including if the business is near a school, daycare, or public park. Delaware Marijuana Commissioner Joshua Sanderlin spoke in support of the bill during a committee meeting last week, arguing that intoxicating hemp products should be regulated like marijuana because they come from the same plant and can have the same psychoactive effect. “It’s THC, it’s not hemp. It’s marijuana,” Sanderlin said. He also argued that unlicensed hemp retailers are undercutting Delaware’s regulated marijuana industry by selling intoxicating products without following the same rules. “What we’re trying to do in the state is stand up our legitimate program to ensure that these businesses who are investing time and money…are actually able to open,” Sanderlin said. Sanderlin said Delaware has issued 90 of the 125 marijuana licenses allowed under the state’s recreational rollout. He said he plans to reopen the licensing process once those existing licensees are established, but noted that many current hemp retailers would likely be out of compliance with marijuana industry rules because they sit too closely to schools and other hemp stores. Chukwuocha’s bill received pushback from some legislators during its committee hearing about its impacts on the small businesses that have already been operating as hemp retailers. Also during the meeting, marijuana retailers spoke in favor of the bill, while hemp retailers and smoke shop owners pushed back. “I know these products are safe. I know they are tested, because if they weren’t, I wouldn’t carry them in my stores,” said Joseph Daniels, owner of Hidden Stash, a smoke shop in Laurel. Lawmakers ultimately advanced it out of committee to the House floor. Competing bill creates path for hemp retailers Unlike Chukwuocha’s bill, a competing bill from Rep. Sean Lynn (D-Dover) and State Sen. Kyra Hoffner (D-Smyrna) would create a separate licensing system for hemp-derived THC products—excluding drinks. HB 401 would allow existing hemp retailers to apply for licenses through the Office of the Marijuana Commissioner. They would only be able to sell items that contained no more than 10 milligrams of THC to adults 21 years old and older. Gas stations, grocery stores and convenience stores would not be eligible for the licenses. In an interview with Spotlight Delaware, Lynn called hemp store owners “the pioneers for what became the marijuana market.” “So do we reward them for their advocacy and being kind of the first to explore this area by shutting down their businesses? I mean, it just doesn’t seem right,” he said. Lynn noted that his bill would also allow existing marijuana retailers to also sell hemp products, and asserted that there isn’t “necessarily an inherent competition there.” His measure would also require lab testing for potency and contaminants, warning labels and packaging rules meant to keep products from appealing to children. The bill would also add a 6 percent state excise tax on retail hemp sales—less than the 15 percent tax imposed on marijuana sales. During a House committee hearing Tuesday, lawmakers cited concerns about a provision in the bill that would restrict counties and municipalities from adopting strict rules about how far apart hemp stores could exist from each other. Some also noted that the measure would mean that the state would impose higher licensing costs and more onerous rules on retailers of marijuana than those selling hemp. Many marijuana business licensees voiced their opposition to Lynn’s bill during the meeting. They asserted that hemp retailers would face an easy, low-cost path to gaining a license, while they faced stricter zoning, security, testing, tracking, and sourcing rules. “The reward for breaking state law is a ‘sell anything you want’ license’,” said James Brobyn, director of Delaware Cannabis Industry Association and owner of Field Supply dispensary. State alcohol and tobacco regulators also opposed the bill, warning lawmakers that the bill does not clearly authorize the agency to inspect businesses, seize products, or enforce violations. They also said the bill focuses too narrowly on delta-9 THC, leaving loopholes for other intoxicating compounds that can be derived from hemp, such as delta-8 THC. Lynn’s bill ultimately did not collect enough signatures to pass through committee on Wednesday, according to the General Assembly’s website. But he said the bill is still collecting signatures. “My understanding is it’s getting out” of committee, Lynn said. Supporting Lynn’s bill is a separate piece of legislation sponsored by Sen. Hoffner, which would clarify when hemp-derived products should be treated as legal hemp rather than marijuana under Delaware law. The bill also sets standards for testing, and would prevent police from using the existence of hemp products as the sole basis for an arrest, search, seizure or criminal prosecution. To be considered, Hoffner’s bill would first be discussed by the Senate Executive Committee. It is not immediately clear when, or if, it will receive a hearing in the committee. Asked over text message about hemp legislation, Hoffner told Spotlight on Thursday that “new developments” came up the night before and that she had to speak with leadership to see what actions need to be taken. When pressed for details about the new developments, Hoffner said, it was “more about the person that was arrested in October.” It is not immediately clear who she was referencing, nor why it is relevant, as she did not respond to follow-up questions sent by text message. This story was first published by Spotlight Delaware. The post Delaware Lawmakers Juggle Competing Bills To Regulate Hemp THC Products appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

Thanks for the blog loaded with so many information. Stopping by your blog helped me to get what I was looking for. agen judi bola

I’m going to read this. I’ll be sure to come back. thanks for sharing. and also This article gives the light in which we can observe the reality. this is very nice one and gives indepth information. thanks for this nice article... elasty filler

I would like to say that this blog really convinced me to do it! Thanks, very good post. montessori lernturm

Thanks so much for sharing this awesome info! I am looking forward to see more postsby you! situs bola alexistogel

I have read all the comments and suggestions posted by the visitors for this article are very fine,We will wait for your next article so only.Thanks! wooden baby walker

Your work is truly appreciated round the clock and the globe. It is incredibly a comprehensive and helpful blog. AK 게임 도메인

You there, this is really good post here. Thanks for taking the time to post such valuable information. Quality content is what always gets the visitors coming. hptoto link alternatif

This is my first time i visit here. I found so many interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here keep up the good work wooden baby walker

This type of message always inspiring and I prefer to read quality content, so happy to find good place to many here in the post, the writing is just great, thanks for the post. AK 게임

“We’re not saying Alabama’s not going to do this. We certainly are going to do this, but if you receive it without objection, it’s scheduled immediately.” By Anna Barrett, Alabama Reflector The governing body of the Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) Thursday voted to object to a federal rescheduling of marijuana after state health officials said they needed more time to determine how to implement it. Dr. Scott Harris, Alabama’s top health official, told members of the State Committee of Public Health that the state “fully intends” to implement the change. “We’re not saying Alabama’s not going to do this,” Harris told the committee. “We certainly are going to do this, but if you receive it without objection, it’s scheduled immediately. If you do nothing, it’s scheduled within 30 days. I’m going to ask you to take the third option, which is to object. Then we just have a little bit of time to figure this out with all of our other stakeholders.” The committee vote was unanimous. Brian Hale, ADPH’s chief legal officer, said during the meeting the objection would trigger a public comment period. That period would last 30 to 60 days. “The objection is simply to allow more time for input into the implications of this rescheduling,” Hale said. ‘There’ll be a public hearing scheduled, we’ll see comments that way, and then we’ll talk to other stakeholders, licensing boards and others that may be affected to see what their input may be.” In April, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) moved marijuana from Schedule I—the Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) list of drugs with the greatest potential for abuse and least legitimate use—to Schedule III, with drugs considered to have a moderate to low potential for physical and psychological dependence, according to DEA. The order followed an executive order signed by President Donald Trump in December instructing the DOJ to move towards rescheduling. Former President Joe Biden instructed the DOJ to reschedule the drug in 2024, but hearings on the move were canceled in early 2025. The federal order applies to state-licensed medical marijuana products in the states that allow medicinal use of the drug. The move means those businesses can deduct business expenses from their federal taxes and researchers have access to state-legal products. As a Schedule I drug, only cannabis grown in a federal facility could be studied, severely limiting the supply available to researchers. Alabama has a medical cannabis program passed by the Legislature in 2021. A Montgomery dispensary said last week that it expects to make medical marijuana available to patients soon. A message seeking comment from Vince Schilleci, the owner of the dispensary, was left Thursday afternoon. Harris said that rescheduling would not be in violation of state law, but after talking with the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC), he was unsure how the rescheduling would impact the program. “We have been working really hard to try to figure out what the implications of this are. There are a number of things that don’t exactly conflict with state law or other rules, but they require some thinking to figure out how to implement,” Harris said. Justin Aday, general counsel for the AMCC, said in a phone interview that the commission does not foresee any immediate impact of the federal rescheduling or the delay of rescheduling at the state level. “We certainly understand the committee and their desire to collect additional information about exactly what the implication is of the federal rescheduling and what the implication would be, depending on where medical cannabis is scheduled at the state level,” Aday said. “We will certainly participate in that process as needed, and provide whatever information we can.” This story was first published by Alabama Reflector. The post Alabama Officials Move To Delay Automatic Rescheduling Of Marijuana Under State Law Following Trump’s Federal Move appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

I high appreciate this post. It’s hard to find the good from the bad sometimes, but I think you’ve nailed it! would you mind updating your blog with more information? 강남달토

I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post. 강남달리는토끼