All Activity

Wow, excellent post. I'd like to draft like this too - taking time and real hard work to make a great article. This post has encouraged me to write some posts that I am going to write soon. nekatwin

I really liked how relaxed and easy the experience felt. After choosing Escorts Service in Karol Bagh, everything moved smoothly without confusion. The companion was respectful, friendly, and made me feel comfortable. She understood how to keep the mood calm and pleasant. The agency handled everything properly and kept full privacy. It’s a good option for anyone looking for a peaceful break and friendly company. I felt satisfied and comfortable throughout the time.

Great article Lot's of information to Read...Great Man Keep Posting and update to People..Thanks crm for plumbers Great article Lot's of information to Read...Great Man Keep Posting and update to People..Thanks evostoto alternatif Great article Lot's of information to Read...Great Man Keep Posting and update to People..Thanks evostoto login Great article Lot's of information to Read...Great Man Keep Posting and update to People..Thanks jasa review bintang 5 aplikasi android Great article Lot's of information to Read...Great Man Keep Posting and update to People..Thanks teknologi pangan

A calm companion can really change your mood for the better. I experienced that when I met a Kirti Nagar Escort during a busy day. She was kind, patient, and made conversation feel natural. The time passed easily, without any awkwardness. Everything was handled professionally, and I felt comfortable throughout. It’s a good way to enjoy peaceful company and take a short break from daily stress. I appreciated the respectful attitude and smooth service.

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. link nekatwin

Marijuana banking bill momentum; State legalization gets boost from Trump move; GOP AGs concerned over cannabis rescheduling; FL legalization to court Subscribe to receive Marijuana Moment’s newsletter in your inbox every weekday morning. It’s the best way to make sure you know which cannabis stories are shaping the day. Get our daily newsletter. Email address: Leave this field empty if you're human: Your support makes Marijuana Moment possible… Your good deed for the day: donate to an independent publisher like Marijuana Moment and ensure that as many voters as possible have access to the most in-depth cannabis reporting out there. Support our work at https://www.patreon.com/marijuanamoment / TOP THINGS TO KNOW President Donald Trump touted the benefits of medical marijuana as a safer “substitute for addictive and potentially lethal opioid painkillers”—but clarified that he is “not going to be taking it” himself. “I don’t want it.” Sen. Ted Budd (R-NC) is suggesting that President Donald Trump lied when he said during a marijuana rescheduling signing ceremony that he hadn’t received any calls opposing the move—with the senator saying he spoke to the president about his concerns just days earlier. Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-OH) told Marijuana Moment that lawmakers have not yet discussed reintroducing marijuana banking legislation this Congress due to other priorities but that federal cannabis rescheduling “changes it big time.” President Donald Trump’s federal marijuana rescheduling move could boost efforts to legalize cannabis in Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Wyoming and other states—lawmakers and elected officials say. A coalition of Republican state attorneys general are pushing back against President Donald Trump’s decision to reschedule cannabis—saying “the science surrounding marijuana…properly establishes it as a Schedule I drug, and we have seen firsthand the harm the drug has caused in our communities.” Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier (R) has formally asked the state Supreme Court to begin a review of a marijuana legalization initiative to determine whether it meets constitutional requirements to appear on the 2026 ballot. Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine (R) signed a bill to recriminalize some marijuana activity that was legalized under a voter-approved ballot measure—while also line-item-vetoing a provision that would’ve allowed hemp THC drink sales for another year. The Alabama Alcohol Beverage Control Board approved an emergency rule regulating consumable hemp product sales over the opposition of a state representative who sponsored the law underlying the regulation. Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach (R) and the director of the Kansas Bureau of Investigation are being sued over raids against hemp businesses that they claimed were selling illegal marijuana products. / FEDERAL The Drug Enforcement Administration is proposing to place several synthetic cannabinoids in Schedule I. Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) discussed the case of former federal marijuana prisoner Weldon Angelos in a Senate floor speech. Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD) suggested ahead of President Donald Trump signing a marijuana rescheduling executive order that the president might change his mind and not do it. Several Republican members of Congress expressed concerns about marijuana rescheduling. The House bill to let Department of Veterans Affairs doctors issue medical cannabis recommendations got one new cosponsor for a total of two. / STATES North Dakota Gov. Kelly Armstrong (R) said the impact of marijuana rescheduling could be “really complicated.” California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) announced the awarding of marijuana revenue-funded grants to support programs focused on preventing youth substance use. The Ohio Supreme Court issued a ruling in a case on marijuana metabolites in a driver’s system. The Texas Supreme Court declined to take up Austin’s appeal of a lower court ruling blocking its voter-approved marijuana decriminalization law. Arizona regulators announced a recall of marijuana products due to possible pesticide contamination. Nevada regulators issued an amended bulletin about marijuana products that were treated with an unapproved pesticide. Delaware, Maryland and Michigan regulators published guidance about the federal move to reschedule marijuana. New York regulators approved additional marijuana business licenses. Oklahoma regulators’ medical cannabis licensing portal is experiencing problems. Minnesota regulators extended the deadline to apply for a cannabis industry training grants program. — Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments. Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access. — / LOCAL Howard County, Maryland officials reached an agreement to allow firefighters to use medical cannabis while off duty. / INTERNATIONAL Jamaica’s minister of industry, investment and commerce praised the U.S.’s move to reschedule marijuana. The United Arab Emirates government issued a decree regulating industrial and medical uses of hemp. / SCIENCE & HEALTH A study of goats found that “liposomal CBD demonstrated remarkable efficacy in pain control and wellbeing improvement for several weeks and can potentially provide similar results in humans.” A review concluded that “psilocybin shows promise as a multidimensional therapy for chronic pain, addressing both sensory and affective components.” / ADVOCACY, OPINION & ANALYSIS The Cannabis Regulators Association published an explainer on what marijuana rescheduling would and would not mean. The Wall Street Journal editorial board criticized President Donald Trump’s move to reschedule marijuana. The Washington Examiner editorial board is arguing that President Donald Trump’s marijuana rescheduling move will “actively harm some of his most fervent supporters, and undermine both his anti-drug and anti-crime efforts.” / BUSINESS Trulieve Cannabis Corp.’s CEO spoke about her discussions with President Donald Trump ahead of his decision to reschedule marijuana. The Cannabist Company Holdings Inc. is selling its Virginia assets to Millstreet Credit Fund LP after that company outbid Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. / CULTURE Jimmy Kimmel joked about President Donald Trump appearing sleepy during his marijuana rescheduling order signing ceremony. Make sure to subscribe to get Marijuana Moment’s daily dispatch in your inbox. Get our daily newsletter. Email address: Leave this field empty if you're human: Photo courtesy of Chris Wallis // Side Pocket Images. The post Trump lied about cannabis rescheduling opposition, GOP senator says (Newsletter: December 22, 2025) appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

Very useful post. This is my first time i visit here. I found so many interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion. Really its great article. Keep it up. slot demo

This Escorts Service Gurgaon promises authentic companionship with gorgeous women who know how to satisfy both emotionally and physically. Their charm, beauty, and friendliness create an unforgettable atmosphere of romance and passion. Discreet bookings, verified profiles, and professional behavior make every meeting safe, comfortable, and deeply pleasurable.

Spending time with a Noida Escort often suits those searching for stability, wherein arrangements sense easy, boundaries are reputable, and the experience develops certainly through communication, consolation, and a feel of ease rather than rushed exhilaration or synthetic energy.

Escorts Service in Connaught Place always delivers with excellence and class. Each detail is perfectly managed, ensuring your experience feels comfortable, enjoyable, and worth remembering.

“Store owners have had varying amounts of legal products seized with no recourse to recover the products or the potential profits from those products.” By Tim Carpenter, Kansas Reflector A McPherson County lawsuit filed by a Kansas business owner challenges “unconstitutionally vague” enforcement operations leading to seizure of cash and hemp-derived products at direction of the state’s attorney general and director of the Kansas Bureau of Investigation. KBI director Tony Mattivi and Attorney General Kris Kobach said in October law enforcement officers raided CBD and vape shops to serve more than a dozen search warrants on businesses suspected of not complying with state drug law. In a statement, Mattivi said targeted stores were “nothing but weed dealers” and the state must “enforce our controlled-substance laws when we have these substances causing bad effects on Kansas kids.” Barry Grissom and Jake Miller, of a law firm based in Kansas City, Missouri, responded Monday by seeking on behalf of Mike Ballinger, owner of the McPherson CBD store Hanging Leaf, a court injunction to stop comparable raids and to compel return of seized property. “The pleadings speak for themselves,” said Grissom, a former U.S. attorney for the District of Kansas and advocate for legalizing marijuana sales and consumption in Kansas. Both Mattivi and Kobach, in their official capacity, were named in the filing requesting injunctive relief from “recent enforcement actions involving hemp products legally permitted under Kansas law.” On October 1, Mattivi and Kobach disclosed their statewide “marijuana enforcement operation” focused on vape shops and CBD dispensaries. This law enforcement effort resulted in execution of at least 15 search warrants across Kansas. The lawsuit said authorities seized $7,000 in inventory as well as cash from Hanging Leaf. A portion of cash taken into custody at Hanging Leaf was property of an unrelated business operated by the plaintiff, the suit said. Attorneys for the plaintiff said Kansas law permitted hemp products with no more than 0.3 percent Delta-9 THC or tetrahydrocannabinol. The plaintiff alleged KBI testing with gas chromatography was capable of detecting “only the presence of THC and cannot determine the origin” of the substance. The suit says the KBI testing regimen improperly resulted in seizure of compliant goods. In addition, the plaintiff asserted unconstitutional vagueness of Kansas law fostered “arbitrary enforcement that chills protected business activities.” The filing requested raids to be forbidden until the state adopted legal protection for products under 0.3 percent hemp derived from Delta-9 THC. “Because of the overly broad and wide-ranging nature of the search warrants issued as part of the operation, and of Kansas law itself, store owners have had varying amounts of legal products seized with no recourse to recover the products or the potential profits from those products,” the lawsuit said. This story was first published by Kansas Reflector. The post Kansas Attorney General And Law Enforcement Sued Over Raids On Hemp Businesses appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

This can be consequently lovely along with inventive. I merely enjoy your hues along with anyone becomes the idea inside snail mail are going to be cheerful. loft conversions London

You happen to be permitted to article labels, and not backlinks, until these are accredited along with in theme. loft conversions London

Love to read it,Waiting For More new Update and I Already Read your Recent Post its Great Thanks. best ai apps to learn spanish Love to read it,Waiting For More new Update and I Already Read your Recent Post its Great Thanks. teknologi pangan Love to read it,Waiting For More new Update and I Already Read your Recent Post its Great Thanks. jasa review bintang 5 aplikasi android Love to read it,Waiting For More new Update and I Already Read your Recent Post its Great Thanks. bandar slot

I’m prompted while using the surpassing in addition to preachy checklist you give in such very little timing. mitochondrial support treatments for chronic fatigue and brain fog

“Nowhere in the authorizing legislation does it provide for a Responsible Consumable Hemp Product Program.” By Anna Barrett, Alabama Reflector The Alabama Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) Board Thursday approved an emergency, temporary rule regulating the sale of consumable hemp products, over the opposition of a state representative who sponsored the law leading to the regulation. The rule creates the Responsible Consumable Hemp Product Program and establishes warnings and fees for violations of the rule. David Peacock, chief general counsel for the ABC Board, told board members that on first violation of the rule, retailers would receive a warning, and distributors would be fined $1,000 on first offense for selling a product that is not approved by the board. “If the distributor were to purchase a product from a supplier that was violative a second time, they would no longer be able to use that supplier unless they provide to us a corrective action plan that we approve,” Peacock said. Peacock did not say what products would be prohibited or allowed, but that there would be a list of products published on the ABC Board’s website. Peacock said the rule is needed in accordance with HB 445, sponsored by Rep. Andy Whitt, R-Harvest, which passed the Legislature this spring. The law, which goes into effect on January 1, requires testing and labeling for all consumable hemp products and caps THC at 10 milligrams per individually wrapped product and 40 milligrams per package. It also requires the ABC Board to license retailers of these products; restrict retail establishments selling hemp products and impose an excise tax on consumable hemp products. In October, the ABC Board passed a rule to implement the law. The emergency rule passed 2-1 with board member John Knight, a former state representative, voting against it. “I’m opposed to it only because I have a problem with the way it was done,” Knight said. Whitt, who did not attend Thursday’s meeting, sent the board a letter Wednesday expressing his opposition to the emergency rule. “In addition to my concerns about the non-compliance with statutory guidelines about emergency rules, there are other areas of the proposal that bother me,” the letter said. “Nowhere in the authorizing legislation does it provide for a Responsible Consumable Hemp Product Program, such as that legislatively authorized by Alabama Code Section 28-10-4 in connection with alcoholic beverages. Therefore, it seems that this proposed regulation goes beyond statutory authority.” Whitt said in an interview Thursday afternoon that he had a great relationship with the board but reiterated his opposition to the rule. “I think when it comes down to the emergency rulings, it serves a different purpose than maybe what’s transparent to begin with, maybe a self-serving group,” he said. “I want to make sure that it doesn’t and that the legislative process works.” Curtis Stewart, the board’s administrator, explained that the rule’s intention is to protect retailers. “I think it’s important to remember that this rule doesn’t punish, doesn’t make anything harder for anyone. In fact, it gives the innocent, if you will, retailer, an avenue to say, ‘Look, I tried to do all I could to provide quality products,’” Stewart said. Donna Alexander, executive director of the Alabama Wholesale Beer Association, expressed opposition to the rule at the meeting. “This emergency rule does not follow the law the Legislature passed that Rep. Andy Whitt sponsored,” Alexander said in an interview after the meeting. Whitt wrote in his letter that the rule had less severe consequences than the original bill. “Penalties imposed by the proposed Emergency Rule for violations are not congruent with those found in the statute I sponsored but begin at a lesser level. Again, this is a serious concern,” Whitt wrote. The rule will expire on April 16. The process of approving a permanent version of the rule passed the board unanimously. The permanent version will be up for public comment and changes before final vote and implementation. Melissa Morrissette, a board member, said the emergency rule was needed to protect retailers and consumers until the process of a permanent rule could play out. “Starting January 1st, you have this window of time that it’s like the Wild West,” Morrissette said. Whitt said he does not foresee any repeal legislation during the 2026 legislative session, which begins on January 13. This story was first published by Alabama Reflector. Photo courtesy of Max Jackson. The post Alabama Regulators Approve Hemp Product Rule Despite Opposition From Key Lawmaker appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

Helpful — I valued the transparency on player complaint resolution timelines. Quick, fair resolution processes prevent toxic situations from escalating. Real votes showed which teams are responsive. bandar slot

If you're an avid gamer seeking an exhilarating online experience, look no further than Slope 2. This action-packed game combines speed, strategy, and reflexes, making it an exciting challenge for players of all skill levels. In this article, we'll discuss how to play Slope 2, share some gameplay tips, and help you make the most of your gaming experience.

“The simplest thing, frankly, to do is to stop it right now instead of going until the date in November set by federal law.” By Megan Henry, Ohio Capital Journal Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine (R) signed a bill into law Friday that bans intoxicating hemp products and makes various changes to the state’s voter-passed marijuana law, including adding crimes such as making it illegal to bring legally purchased marijuana from another state back to Ohio. DeWine signed Ohio Senate Bill 56, which will take effect in 90 days. He has been urging Ohio lawmakers to do something about intoxicating hemp products for the past nearly two years. Ohio’s bill complies with recent federal changes by banning intoxicating hemp products from being sold outside of a licensed marijuana dispensary. In November, Congress voted to ban products that contain 0.4 milligrams of total THC per container earlier this month when they voted to reopen the government. Those who work in the intoxicating hemp industry are worried this will put thousands of people out of business. DeWine line-item-vetoed the THC-infused beverage provision in the bill that would have allowed five milligram THC beverages to be manufactured, distributed, and sold in Ohio until December 31, 2026. “My veto means that they cannot be sold,” DeWine said during a Friday press conference. “The simplest thing, frankly, to do is to stop it right now instead of going until the date in November set by federal law.” DeWine said he does not think THC beverages are a good idea. “I think they create extra problems,” DeWine said. Ohio S.B. 56 had a provision that said if the federal government legalizes THC beverages, Ohio will consider “a more robust regulatory framework of these products,” according to the bill’s language. “We got to this point because of poorly drafted federal legislation and people taking advantage of it,” Ohio House Speaker Matt Huffman, R-Lima, said. “So speculating about what the federal government may do in the future and what we may do as a result, I think, adds to the same problem that has already been created.” On the marijuana side, the bill would reduce the THC levels in adult-use marijuana extracts from a maximum of 90 percent down to a maximum of 70 percent, cap THC levels in adult-use flower to 35 percent, and prohibit smoking in most public places. Part of the probable cause portions were removed from the bill, but some of it still remains. The bill prohibits possessing marijuana in anything outside of its original packaging and criminalizes bringing legal marijuana from another state back to Ohio. It also requires drivers to store marijuana in the trunk of their car while driving. Ohio S.B. 56 would give 36 percent of adult-use marijuana sale revenue to municipalities and townships that have recreational marijuana dispensaries. The bill also maintains the 10 percent tax rate on recreational marijuana and keeps home grow the same at six plants per adult and 12 per residence. It also places a cap on 400 marijuana dispensaries in the state. Ohioans passed a citizen-initiated law to legalize recreational marijuana in 2023 with 57 percent of the vote. Sales started in August 2024 and exceeded $702.5 million in the first year. Ohio lawmakers can change the law since it passed as a citizen initiative not a constitutional amendment, something they have been trying to do since late 2023. This story was first published by Ohio Capital Journal. Photo courtesy of Chris Wallis // Side Pocket Images. The post Ohio Governor Signs Bill To Recriminalize Some Marijuana Activity, Vetoing Provision To Allow THC Drinks For A Year appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

If marijuana rescheduling is finalized as President Donald Trump instructed on Thursday, the practical policy impact on the federal level will be somewhat limited, as cannabis would remain illegal. But lawmakers in states like Pennsylvania and Tennessee say the political effect could ultimately prove more impactful as they work to enact local reforms in the next year. The executive order Trump signed directs the attorney general to complete a process to move cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), which would let cannabis businesses take federal tax deductions and lift certain research barriers. While it wouldn’t legitimize state marijuana programs in the eyes of the federal government, the decision by a Republican president to loosen longstanding cannabis laws and recognize its medical benefits could embolden on-the-fence legislators at the state level, who may see it as a signal that the politics of the issue are shifting and there’s a lower risk of federal enforcement action. In Pennsylvania, for example, bipartisan lawmakers who’ve been working to enact adult-use legalization over recent sessions without success so far say Trump’s rescheduling action could grease the wheels in the new year. “I think that having President Trump, in particular, sign this executive order really gives permission for a lot of Republican lawmakers who may have been reticent about actually admitting that they supported it some cover to be able to actually support it,” Rep. Emily Kinkead (D) said. “I am even more optimistic than I was that we are going to get legalization of recreational cannabis done in Pennsylvania in 2026.” The executive action “reflects the support that we see broadly in the nation—that, overwhelmingly, people support legalization of marijuana, and it is bipartisan,” Kinkead told CBS Pittsburgh. “There isn’t much on which I agree with President Trump, but rescheduling cannabis is long overdue,” she said separately in a press release. “In 2026, Pennsylvania needs to join every other state in the Northeastern United States and legalize adult recreational use—for revenue, for jobs, for justice.” Rep. Abby Major (R), who is sponsoring a legalization bill with Kinkead, said she looks forward to “building off the momentum of rescheduling by working with my colleagues in the House and Senate to deliver what 74 percent of Pennsylvanians want: adult-use cannabis,” “We’ve seen the clearest indication from the White House today that Republicans can lead on cannabis. It shouldn’t be any different in Pennsylvania,” she said on Thursday. Rep. Dan Frankel (D), chair of the House Health Committee and another champion of reform in the legislature, also said the rescheduling move will “bolster the existing medical marijuana marketplace.” “I think it’s going to be a significant step in the right direction to get us to a point where we’re not criminalizing marijuana,” he said. “It’s a significant step to creating an environment where people can purchase at this point medical marijuana without worrying about potential federal criminal penalties.” While there may be some disagreement among lawmakers about rescheduling or broader reform, Trump’s executive order marks a “step toward common-sense drug policy reform,” Sen. Dan Laughlin (R) said. “I know this is a topic that sparks strong opinions on both sides, but if you take an objective look at the guidelines, marijuana should have never been classified as a Schedule I drug,” he said. “I support the Trump Administration’s decision to reclassify it as a Schedule III substance, which better reflects the scientific evidence and could help unlock more research, medical applications, and regulatory clarity.” Laughlin’s Democratic counterpart on bills to legalize cannabis in the Keystone State, Sen. Sharif Street (D), said the rescheduling decision “is a long-overdue and evidence-based step that acknowledges what doctors have known for years: Cannabis doesn’t belong in the same legal category as heroin.” “But this is only the first step. Rescheduling cannabis doesn’t undo the harms of the past,” he said. “Real reform must include expungement, reinvesting resources in communities most impacted by the war on drugs—especially Black and Brown communities—and a legal, regulated market that prioritizes public health, safety and equity.” “That’s why I’ve been fighting in Harrisburg to legalize and regulate adult-use cannabis on a bipartisan basis—and why I’m now prepared to take that fight to Washington,” Street, who is running for Congress, said. Brit Crampsie, a spokesperson for the industry advocacy group ResponsiblePA, said the president’s “move to reclassify cannabis is a major wake-up call to state lawmakers who are failing Pennsylvanians.” “We lag behind our neighboring states that already have regulation on the books,” she said. “Further, with the reclassification of cannabis nationwide by the Trump administration and the closing of the intoxicating hemp loophole by Congress, Pennsylvania must step up and institute comprehensive cannabis regulation.” Not every lawmaker is taking the rescheduling news as an affirmation to move forward with legalization, however. Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman (R), for example, said he continues to feel “this is an issue which the federal government needs to provide consistent policy on, rather than states engaging in piecemeal approaches that do not comport with current federal law.” “While President Trump’s Executive Order is a step to offer greater clarity and uniformity for medical marijuana, it does not legalize or encourage the use of marijuana for recreational purposes,” he said, adding that Democratic House lawmakers earlier this year “took a massive step backward in this debate by sending us such an unserious recreational marijuana legalization proposal.” News: In response to President Trump's EO to expediate rescheduling marijuana, Pa. Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman (R., Indiana) said in a statement that it hasn't changed his skepticism of legalizing recreational cannabis. pic.twitter.com/U6mgJcpgdy — Stephen Caruso (@StephenJ_Caruso) December 19, 2025 “At this time, we have very complex issues with a higher level of urgency to address, such as gaming reform, to provide clarity and ensure public safety,” he said. For what it’s worth, another top GOP senator—Sen. Scott Martin (R), chair of the chamber’s Appropriations Committee—said earlier this month that he was skeptical about the prospects of enacting legalizing in the 2026 session, in part because of the federal classification of cannabis that’s now expected to change. Of course, marijuana would still be federally illegal under Schedule III, so it’s unclear if a simple loosening of the law would move the needle enough from his perspective. There’s talk about advancing state-level reform in red states, too. In Tennessee, for instance, the Republican House speaker described the rescheduling development as a “first step,” though he noted there are still certain outstanding logistical questions to answer. “There will have to be conversations about who manufactures it, who tests it, who distributes, which medical illness could it be used for, does this require [federal Food and Drug Administration, or FDA] approval and a host of other questions,” House Speaker Cameron Sexton (R) told The Tennessean. House Majority Leader William Lamberth (R), who has worked to restrict intoxicating hemp products, added that “any change in the federal drug schedule that acknowledges legitimate medical use based on scientific evidence will certainly be taken into consideration as we strive to form an appropriate legal framework for dangerous substances.” Sen. London Lamar (D), for her part, told WSMV that “if Washington can acknowledge reality, Tennessee can, too.” “Our marijuana laws are stuck in the dark ages—overly punitive, out of step with our neighbors and holding our state back,” she said. “It’s time for the General Assembly to take a serious step forward on cannabis reform.” “Cannabis reform is about freedom, public health and fiscal responsibility. We should be supporting medical researchers who want to study cannabis and patients who would choose cannabis treatments over deadly opioids,” Lamar said. “Our current laws force us to waste tax dollars on incarceration instead of investing in roads, schools and healthcare, and we’re also missing out on economic growth and new revenue.” Over in Wyoming, the rescheduling news elicited a different kind of reaction from state Attorney General Keith Kautz (R), who was asked about how the state will navigate a “trigger law” that’s generally intended to align federal and state drug scheduling statutes. If U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi abides by Trump’s directive and finalizes the rescheduling rule, the Wyoming attorney general’s office would have 30 days from then to either adopt the marijuana classification or provide an explanation if it chooses to stay the course. “I’m just going to follow the statute,” Kautz said. “And I already [noted] that our state has been reluctant to go the route of medical marijuana.” To that point, after the Trump administration rescinded Biden era guidance on cannabis prosecutorial discretion, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Wyoming advised that it would begin “rigorously” prosecuting people over cannabis use or possession on federal lands within the state. Given how recently the executive order was signed, it is likely that lawmakers and officials in more states will be taking the federal action into account as they prepare for the 2026 session. And for advocates, the symbolism of rescheduling is a welcome sign of revamped momentum that helpfully demonstrates just how bipartisan marijuana policy reform has become. Photo courtesy of Max Pixel. The post Trump’s Marijuana Rescheduling Move Could Boost State Legalization Efforts, Lawmakers In Pennsylvania And Tennessee Say appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

A GOP senator is suggesting that President Donald Trump lied when he said during a signing ceremony for a marijuana rescheduling executive order this week that he hadn’t received any calls in opposition to the reform. During Thursday’s event, Trump noted strong public support for marijuana reform and said numerous people called him to voice support for cannabis rescheduling. “I don’t think I received any calls on the other side of it,” he said. That comment didn’t sit right with Sen. Ted Budd (R-NC), who says he in fact called the president to express his opposition to rescheduling marijuana just days ago. “I called him personally Friday last week and let him know,” the senator told Punchbowl News. Budd said he is also aware that other lawmakers had called Trump to urge him not to enact the federal reclassification of marijuana. “I was aware of people calling him then—against rescheduling,” he said. “So I knew that my colleagues had been calling him.” “I called him personally Friday last week and let him know. He said that others had been calling him on the issue,” Budd said in an interview. “I was aware of people calling him then — against rescheduling. So I knew that my colleagues had been calling him.” — Andrew Desiderio (@AndrewDesiderio) December 18, 2025 Earlier this week, Budd led a group of GOP senators in sending a letter urging Trump not to reschedule cannabis. House Republican lawmakers also sent a separate letter to the president on the issue. Trump, however, dismissed those concerns during Thursday’s signing ceremony—pointing out that an overwhelming majority of Americans support the reform and that cannabis can help people who are suffering from serious health issues, including his personal friends. Republican state attorneys general are also expressing concerns about Trump’s marijuana move. The executive order Trump signed directs the attorney general to complete a process to move cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), which would let cannabis businesses take federal tax deductions and lift certain research barriers. Photo courtesy of Max Pixel. The post Trump Lied About Not Getting Any Calls Against Marijuana Rescheduling, GOP Senator Suggests appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

A coalition of Republican state attorneys general are criticizing President Donald Trump’s decision to federally reschedule marijuana, saying cannabis is “properly” classified as a Schedule I drug with no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. “Since before President Trump took office, many of us…have argued against the rescheduling of marijuana as a Schedule I drug,” the attorneys general of Indiana, Iowa, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Wyoming said in a joint statement on Thursday. “We all believe the science surrounding marijuana—which has become only more clear in recent weeks—properly establishes it as a Schedule I drug, and we have seen firsthand the harm the drug has caused in our communities.” The statement, led by Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers (R), who has separately sought to overturn his state’s voter-approved medical cannabis law, says the “negative impacts of expanded marijuana use, especially on children and adolescents, are worrisome.” “And the public policy challenges, such as the exponential increase in difficult-to-combat driving under the influence, are both significant and serious,” the coalition of GOP AGs said. “We have conveyed our concerns to the Administration, and we are grateful for the Administration’s good faith consideration of our views.” pic.twitter.com/yJnIzm96rm — Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers (@NEAttorneyGen) December 18, 2025 “Because of our long-held views, we are concerned with the issuance of this Executive Order, which directs the U.S. Attorney General to ‘take all necessary steps to complete the rulemaking process related to rescheduling marijuana to Schedule III,'” they said. “We will evaluate the order closely to determine how we can best continue to engage, protect the public health, and ensure the safety of our citizens.” Separately, South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley (R) revealed in a press released that he and other state attorneys general “had a conference call with the White House regarding the implementation and effect of the President’s Executive Order” on Thursday after Trump held a signing ceremony. Jackley “greatly appreciates President Trump’s Administration’s open and continued dialogue with the Attorneys General,” he said. “It is important to recognize that the federal rescheduling of marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III drug does not criminally legalize marijuana under federal law. Also, current federal law also does not permit a licensed physician to prescribe marijuana until marijuana receives FDA approval,” Jackley said. “Marijuana use and possession is also illegal under South Dakota state law for recreational use, and permissible only for medical purposes with a valid prescription, a medical card, and from a licensed medical marijuana facility.” Earlier this week, groups of House and Senate Republican lawmakers sent letters urging Trump not to reschedule cannabis. Trump, however, dismissed those concerns—pointing out that an overwhelming majority of Americans support the reform and that cannabis can help people who are suffering from serious health issues, including his personal friends. Rescheduling will not federally legalize cannabis. But the policy change will allow state-licensed marijuana businesses to take federal tax deductions they’ve been deprived under an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) code known as 280E. It will also remove certain research barriers applied to Schedule I drugs. The post GOP State Attorneys General Push Back On Trump’s Marijuana Move, Saying It Could Harm ‘The Safety Of Our Citizens’ appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

Florida’s attorney general is asking the state Supreme Court to review the constitutionality of an initiative to legalize marijuana that activists want to put on the 2026 ballot. The court accepted the request, and has set a schedule for state officials and the cannabis campaign to file briefs next month. Smart & Safe Florida said last month that it’s collected more than one million signatures to put the cannabis measure on the ballot, but it’s also challenged officials at the state Supreme Court level over delays the certification process, arguing that the review of the ballot content and summary should have moving forward months ago when it reached an initial signature threshold. The state then agreed to move forward with the processing. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) campaigned heavily against an earlier version of the legalization proposal, which received a majority of voters last year but not enough to meet the 60 percent threshold required to pass a constitutional amendment. Former Attorney General Ashley Moody (R) unsuccessfully contested the prior initiative in the courts. So far, while there’s litigation surrounding certification issues—as well as a separate legal challenge over about 200,000 signatures deemed invalid by the state—the latest filings from the secretary of state’s office and court don’t speak to the substance of the proposed measure. Rather, the court simply said on Wednesday that it received a request from Attorney General James Uthmeier’s (R) office, in compliance with state statutes around ballot initiatives, to conduct a review and issue an advisory opinion on whether the legalization measure is drafted in a way that adheres to constitutional election laws. New material in Re: Adult Personal Use of Marijuana (petition). See the docket here: https://t.co/y0lSh4L0BF pic.twitter.com/YkvUcrgA0E — FloridaSupremeCourt (@flcourts) December 18, 2025 The court said in a filing on Thursday that opponents must provide a brief defending their position by January 2 and provide a copy to the attorney general’s office. Answer briefs must be submitted by January 12, and the opposition must respond to that filing by January 20. Meanwhile, Smart & Safe Florida is encouraging voters who signed the petition to contact their local election supervisors or the secretary of state’s office to determine whether their signatures were invalidated. A federal judge in August separately delivered a win to the campaign—granting “complete relief” from provisions of a law the governor signed to impose other serious restrictions on signature gathering. While the law the governor signed in May wasn’t directly targeted at the cannabis initiative, there’s been concern among supporters that it could jeopardize an already complex and costly process to collect enough signatures to make the ballot. That’s because it would block non-residents and non-citizens from collecting signatures for ballot measures. In March, meanwhile, two Democratic members of Congress representing Florida asked the federal government to investigate what they described as “potentially unlawful diversion” of millions in state Medicaid funds via a group with ties to Gov. Ron DeSantis (R). The money was used to fight against a citizen ballot initiative, vehemently opposed by the governor, that would have legalized marijuana for adults. The lawmakers’ letter followed allegations that a $10 million donation from a state legal settlement was improperly made to the Hope Florida Foundation, which later sent the money to two political nonprofits, which in turn sent $8.5 million to a campaign opposing Amendment 3. The governor said in February that the newest marijuana legalization measure is in “big time trouble” with the state Supreme Court, predicting it will be blocked from going before voters next year. “There’s a lot of different perspectives on on marijuana,” DeSantis said. “It should not be in our Constitution. If you feel strongly about it, you have elections for the legislature. Go back candidates that you believe will be able to deliver what your vision is on that.” “But when you put these things in the Constitution—and I think, I mean, the way they wrote, there’s all kinds of things going on in here. I think it’s going to have big time trouble getting through the Florida Supreme Court,” he said. The latest initiative was filed with the secretary of state’s office just months after the initial version failed during the November 2024 election—despite an endorsement from President Donald Trump. Smart & Safe Florida is hoping the revised version will succeed in 2026. The campaign—which in the last election cycle received tens of millions of dollars from cannabis industry stakeholders, principally the multi-state operator Trulieve—incorporated certain changes into the new version that seem responsive to criticism opponents raised during the 2024 push. For example, it now specifically states that the “smoking and vaping of marijuana in any public place is prohibited.”Another section asserts that the legislature would need to approve rules dealing with the “regulation of the time, place, and manner of the public consumption of marijuana.” Last year, the governor accurately predicted that the 2024 cannabis measure from the campaign would survive a legal challenge from the state attorney general. It’s not entirely clear why he feels this version would face a different outcome. While there’s uncertainty around how the state’s highest court will navigate the measure, a poll released in February showed overwhelming bipartisan voter support for the reform—with 67 percent of Florida voters backing legalization, including 82 percent of Democrats, 66 percent of independents and 55 percent of Republicans. — Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments. Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access. — In the background, a recent poll from a Trump-affiliated research firm found that nearly 9 in 10 Florida voters say they should have the right to decide to legalize marijuana in the state. Meanwhile, a pro-legalization GOP state lawmaker recently filed a bill to amend state law to codify that the public use of marijuana is prohibited. Rep. Alex Andrade (R), the sponsor, said earlier this year that embracing cannabis reform is a way for the Republican party to secure more votes from young people. Separately, Florida medical marijuana officials are actively revoking the registrations of patients and caregivers with drug-related criminal records. The policy is part of broad budget legislation signed into law earlier this year by DeSantis. The provisions in question direct the state Department of Health (DOH) to cancel registrations of medical marijuana patients and caregivers if they’re convicted of—or plead guilty or no contest to—criminal drug charges. Photo elements courtesy of rawpixel and Philip Steffan. The post Florida Attorney General Asks Supreme Court To Review 2026 Marijuana Legalization Ballot Initiative appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

Marijuana can “make people feel much better” and serve as a “substitute for addictive and potentially lethal opioid painkillers,” President Donald Trump said on Thursday as he issued an executive order to federally reschedule cannabis and promote access to CBD for therapeutic purposes. He clarified, however, that he personally has no interest in using marijuana himself. Although the president emphasized that he’s repeatedly lectured his children about abstaining from drug use, he said that “the facts compel the federal government to recognize that marijuana can be legitimate in terms of medical applications when carefully administered.” “In some cases, this may include the use [of cannabis] as a substitute for addictive and potentially lethal opioid painkillers—they cause tremendous problems,” he said, surrounded by health officials, industry stakeholders and advocates. “This can do it in a much lesser way—can make people feel much better that are living through tremendous pain and problems.” That said, Trump made clear that he has no plans to use cannabis. “I don’t want it,” he said. “I’m not going to be taking it, but a lot of people do want it. A lot of people need it.” Trump’s drug policy positions can be sometimes enigmatic—with a historic cannabis rescheduling order being rolled out amid controversy over weeks of unilateral military operations that have killed dozens of people the administration claims were transporting illicit drugs. But he’s been fairly consistent about his support for medical cannabis access. He also emphasized at the signing event that this executive order directing the completion of a rescheduling process that started under the Biden administration “doesn’t legalize marijuana in any way, shape or form—and in no way sanctions its use as a recreational drug.” That’s true. Moving marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) does not federally legalize it. Rather, it recognizes the medical value of cannabis, loosens certain research restrictions and will allow marijuana businesses to take federal tax deductions. “Forty states and multiple U.S. territories have already recognized the use of medical marijuana,” Trump said. “This reclassification order will make it far easier to conduct marijuana-related medical research, allowing us to study benefits, potential dangers and future treatments. It’s going to have a tremendously positive impact.” The president on Thursday also dismissed the concerns of GOP lawmakers who oppose rescheduling, pointing out that an overwhelming majority of Americans support the reform and that cannabis can help people—including his personal friends—who are suffering from serious health issues. On opioids, to the president’s point, numerous studies have linked the legalization of marijuana to reduce overdoses and prescriptions of the prescription painkiller, with many concluding that, when given the option of cannabis as an alternative, a significant patient population will opt for the plant. The post Trump Touts Medical Marijuana As ‘Substitute For Addictive’ Opioids—But Says He Has No Interest In Using It Himself appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

A GOP senator says the while a bipartisan marijuana banking bill remains stalled, with no recent discussions about advancing it as lawmakers focus on other legislative priorities, President Donald Trump’s move to reschedule cannabis could clear the path for further reform. Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-OH), who is expected to sponsor the Secure and Fair Enforcement Regulation (SAFER) Banking Act in his chamber, told Marijuana Moment this week that there have still been “no” conversations about moving the legislation, despite previously predicting it would be taken up in the fall. As the season comes to a close, however, Congress remains preoccupied with competing priorities such as extending health care subsidies and passing spending bills to keep the government funded. “The line is deep in terms of getting stuff done, so that’s something we’ll think about once we get through all these things,” the senator said. But the cannabis banking bill could gain momentum under Trump’s plan to facilitate rescheduling, he added in a second interview. The order issued on Thursday directs federal agencies to complete the process of moving marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and clears the way for a pilot program to provide Medicare coverage for CBD. The president’s move “changes it big time,” Moreno said of the banking bill’s prospects of passage. Before the administrative action was confirmed, he told Marijuana Moment that reclassifying cannabis would represent an “important domino” in the push for SAFER Banking. Placing cannabis in Schedule III won’t legalize the plant, of course, but it will be a symbolic recognition that cannabis holds medical value, while allowing marijuana businesses to take federal tax deductions and loosening certain research barriers associated with Schedule I drugs. To that end, the executive order from Trump could spur on-the-fence GOP lawmakers to advance the banking bill, or at least possibly dissuade skeptics from aggressively opposing it. Notably, days before the White House confirmed the president would address rescheduling, a Senate Banking subcommittee convened and took testimony about banking policy issue, including the unique challenges marijuana businesses face under federal prohibition. Chairman Thom Tillis (R-NC)—who has stood out among his Republican colleagues as someone who’s backed regulating cannabis to some extent at the federal level—said he “absolutely” agreed that the marijuana banking issue should be addressed. Many banks continue to resist accepting even state-licensed cannabis businesses as clients because of the potential risk of federal enforcement action given that marijuana remains a Schedule I drug under the CSA. However, some banks and credit unions have taken that gamble, while following Obama-era reporting guidance to mitigate the risk. The hearing took place about two weeks after a GOP member of the House Financial Services Committee, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH), raised the cannabis banking issue with Comptroller Jonathan Gould at a meeting of that panel. The House has passed versions of the legislation seven times over recent sessions. It advanced out of committee in the Senate last Congress, but it was not taken up on the floor. One of the most proactive anti-cannabis lawmakers on Capitol Hill, Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD), told Marijuana Moment that he’s not sure about the status of the banking bill but he remains of the mind that, “if it’s illegal at the federal level, it should be kept out of the banking system.” The comments from the bipartisan and bicameral lawmakers came about a month after bipartisan senators said they remain eager to advance the marijuana banking measure—though there was disagreement about whether a possible decision from President Donald Trump to reschedule cannabis would open the door to passing additional reforms in Congress. Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT), who’s been the lead GOP sponsor of that banking measure in past sessions, said he’s “not sure absolutely” whether moving marijuana to Schedule III. would meaningfully affect how his colleagues approach the financial services legislation. He said “many senators hold strong opinions,” and “they keep those opinions separate from SAFE Banking.” Unlike Daines, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) said rescheduling would send a “huge message” to his colleagues about the need to “finally come up with a modern approach” to marijuana laws. The LCB contributed reporting from Washington, D.C. The post GOP Senator Says Marijuana Banking Bill Remains Stalled—But Trump’s Rescheduling Order Could Spur Congress To Act appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net