All Activity

It is an excellent blog, I have ever seen. I found all the material on this blog utmost unique and well written. And, I have decided to visit it again and again. situs slot 1000

Allocate only 2/3 of your betting budget and reserve the rest. 1xbet malaysia promo code 2026

Each of these regional offers is tied to your first deposit, and by using the 1xBet Promo Code listed above, new users ensure they receive the full benefits of the platform’s welcome promotion in 2026. Always enter the code 1XLUNE during registration to activate the respective bonus amount for your country free bet promo code 1xbet saudi arabia

New web site is looking good. Thanks for the great effort. bola slot

“It should be unsurprising that national groups with health concerns are interested in helping Massachusetts craft better, safer marijuana laws.” By Chris Lisinski, CommonWealth Beacon When it comes to putting a proposed new law before voters, it helps to have lots of money ready to burn. More than $11 million has already changed hands to advance or oppose a potentially record-breaking field of ballot questions that Massachusetts voters could decide in November, according to newly filed campaign finance reports, including a significant injection by a national dark-money group that opposes legal drug use. All $1.55 million raised so far in support of a proposal to recriminalize recreational marijuana in Massachusetts came from SAM Action Inc., an organization that is not required to disclose the source of its own funding. It’s the same organization that bankrolled opposition to a 2024 Massachusetts ballot question that sought to open up access to some psychedelic substances, which voters rejected. Massachusetts is not alone as a battleground, either. SAM Action is also the only donor behind a ballot question in Maine this cycle that would similarly prohibit recreational pot use there, as the Portland Press Herald reported. Both campaigns have generated scrutiny over their efforts to gather signatures from voters. In Massachusetts, opponents filed an objection alleging the campaign “obtained signatures fraudulently” by telling voters the measure would provide affordable housing or fund public parks, not that it would ban recreational marijuana. The State Ballot Law Commission heard arguments last week and is expected to rule by Friday. State law empowers the panel to determine whether signatures were placed on a ballot question petition “by fraud,” and its interpretation could set off a lengthier court battle over whether the question can go before voters. Similarly, Mainers have been alleging in recent weeks that they were misled about what the anti-marijuana petition would do when they signed it. Maine’s secretary of state, Shenna Bellows, said she’s received complaints about the topic, adding that she has no enforcement power because, as she put it to lawmakers, “You have a right to lie under the First Amendment.” Wendy Wakeman, a veteran Republican operative who is working as spokesperson for the repeal campaign, said the Massachusetts and Maine questions are “not a coordinated effort” despite funding coming from the same national group. SAM Action is a 501(c)(4) organization, so it’s not required to disclose its donors, leaving unclear exactly who is putting major dollars toward shutting down an industry both Massachusetts and Maine voted nearly a decade ago to legalize. On its website, SAM Action claims affiliation with the nonprofit Smart Approaches to Marijuana group co-founded by former US Rep. Patrick Kennedy—a Democrat who represented Rhode Island, and the son of longtime US Sen. Ted Kennedy—along with former White House Office of National Drug Control Policy advisor Kevin Sabet and David Frum, a former speechwriter for President George W. Bush who is now a senior editor at The Atlantic. Wakeman declined to comment on SAM Action’s primary donors. “Massachusetts is in the minority of states in the United States in which marijuana is available recreationally,” she told CommonWealth Beacon. “It should be unsurprising that national groups with health concerns are interested in helping Massachusetts craft better, safer marijuana laws.” While marijuana remains illegal under federal law, 24 states, two territories, and Washington, DC, allow recreational marijuana use by adults, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Several others decriminalized the drug without fully legalizing personal, non-medical use. President Trump last year also signed an executive order reclassifying marijuana as a drug with less potential for harm and dependence, signaling a softer position. SAM opposed that move. Voters in the Bay State approved recreational marijuana use in 2016 by a margin of 54 percent to 46 percent. Since then, the industry has generated more than $8 billion in sales. The proposed ballot question would undo legalization of recreational pot use. It would leave the medical marijuana industry in place, but expand civil penalties for public possession above one ounce. Under one common reading, the surge in ballot questions reflects growing discontent with the Legislature and an attempt to circumvent Beacon Hill’s inertia by putting policy changes directly before voters. Most lawmakers are skeptical or outright disdainful of the trend, arguing that initiative petitions are increasingly a tool exploited by well-financed special interests. Disclosures show that for many questions, big-dollar donors and business groups play a critical role, especially early in the cycle when campaigns are trying to get off the ground. All of the $431,000 raised so far to oppose a rent control revival came from the Greater Boston Real Estate Board, the Massachusetts Association of Realtors, NAIOP, and Nordblom Management, plus another $26,600 in in-kind contributions from MassLandlords Inc. Most of the money behind a proposal that would replace the state’s partisan primaries with an all-party primary system has come from wealthy, often politically involved donors who have backgrounds in private equity or investment banking. Randy Peeler, a senior advisor at Berkshire Partners who’s also on the board of a national group that supports primary election reforms, donated $550,000. Andrew Balson of Cove Hill Partners added another $290,000, and Mark Nunnelly, a former Department of Revenue commissioner under Gov. Charlie Baker and Bain Capital managing director, kicked in $250,000. Nine others donated at least $50,000 each, while former gubernatorial candidate Danielle Allen, the effort’s figurehead, added $20,000 of her own. Jesse Littlewood, the campaign manager for the primary-reform question, said he expects small-dollar donations to increase as the race unfolds. “To be in the game of a ballot initiative where you’re playing to win, it requires a significant amount of resources,” Littlewood said. “We are really thankful that individuals have been willing to fund the work to make a better, healthier democracy, and those folks are providing the resources to do it, especially in the very early stages. It doesn’t mean that’s going to be the entirety of our giving, but they helped us get through the narrowest passages.” Some campaigns are leaning on resources from Beacon Hill insiders past and present. A bipartisan effort to rein in the stipend system that significantly boosts pay for some state representatives and senators hauled in $116,000, combining donations and loans, from former Democratic rep. Jonathan Hecht, a frequent progressive critic of the Legislature, and $112,500 from former MassGOP chair Jennifer Nassour. (Nassour is on the board of MassINC, the nonprofit that publishes CommonWealth Beacon.) Other, smaller donations to the stipend-reform effort came from Allen, current MassGOP chair Amy Carnevale, state Auditor Diana DiZoglio (perhaps Beacon Hill’s most vocal legislative skeptic), former Democratic reps. Denise Provost and Jay Kaufman, and former Baker administration budget chief Michael Heffernan. All lawmakers earn the same base salary, but they can receive significantly more in stipends based on leadership or committee positions. Those additional job titles are essentially awarded by the House speaker and Senate president, and critics argue the system creates a financial incentive for lawmakers to fall in line and not break from leadership. Legislative leaders defend the status quo as the same better-pay-for-more-responsibility arrangement common to the private sector. Through the end of 2025, the multitude of campaign committees supporting and opposing the dozen ballot questions in the mix for this November’s elections together raised more than $11.2 million, including both donations and in-kind contributions, and spent more than $8.8 million, according to a CommonWealth Beacon analysis of financial reports filed with regulators. That amount is all but certain to explode as influential groups begin pitching their ideas directly to voters in the run-up to the November election. At this same point in the electoral cycle two years ago, for example, proponents of a question to cease using MCAS standardized test results as a graduation requirement had received a bit more than $1.1 million in in-kind contributions. The opposition at that point did not even have any fundraising to report. But by the time the dust settled in 2024, involved parties had collectively deployed more than $21 million on the politically bruising race. Eleven of the ballot questions on track are newly filed this cycle, while the twelfth — a proposed repeal of the state’s 2024 sweeping gun reform law — originated that year but was not eligible to go before voters until 2026. For most campaigns, early spending focused so far almost entirely on the biggest obstacle en route to the ballot: collecting enough voter signatures. Supporters needed to collect at least 74,574 signatures from registered Massachusetts voters to keep each question in the mix. Organizers will need another, smaller round of signatures later this year to lock in their spots. Most of the campaigns spent at least $750,000 on signature-gathering services, according to their disclosures. But some organizers seem to have secured much better deals than their counterparts to come up with roughly comparable totals of certified signatures. The campaign working to legalize Election Day voter registration, backed by Secretary of State William Galvin, spent $75,000 on signature-gathering with Massachusetts firm SignatureDrive. Another campaign, headed by DiZoglio, that is hoping to subject the Legislature and governor’s office to public records requests spent $150,000 with the same company. Meanwhile, those pushing a question to allow single-family homes to be built on smaller lots spent nearly $1.3 million with SignatureDrive, more than 17 times as much as did Galvin’s team. Some campaigns supplement paid signature collection with volunteer efforts, which defray the total costs, and others lean on influential organizations whose staff signature-gathering work gets counted as in-kind contributions. If all of the questions make the ballot, it would be an even dozen, crushing the record of nine statewide ballot questions in a single year. With so many in the mix, it’s likely that the amount of money spent on electioneering will also reach a new high. The record came in 2022, when campaigns supporting and opposing four measures collectively spent $65.8 million. (Nearly two-thirds of that amount was spent just on the successful ballot question imposing a surtax on wealthy households.) All ballot question campaigns by Tuesday had to file 2025 year-end financial reports. Under state law, the campaigns do not need to submit their next financial disclosures until September, keeping most of the fundraising and spending obscured from public view until close to the election. The Senate last week approved legislation that would require ballot question campaign committees to file financial reports at least monthly in election years. It’s not clear if or when the House will take up the measure. This article first appeared on CommonWealth Beacon and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. The post ‘Dark Money’ Anti-Marijuana Group Is Bankrolling Ballot Measures To Roll Back Legalization In Multiple States, Records Show appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

Delaware lawmakers are considering legislation that would allow terminally ill patients to use medical cannabis in hospitals and other healthcare facilities. The Senate Health & Social Services Committee held a hearing on the bill, sponsored by Sen. Marie Pinkney (R), on Wednesday. Pinkney, who chairs the panel that approved the measure, said it “basically says that terminally ill patients…have the ability to bring in their medical cannabis that they are already using at home, and they are responsible for storing it.” Under SB 226, patients and their caregivers would be responsible for acquiring and administering medical marijuana, and it would need to be stored securely at all times in a locked container. Smoking or vaping of medical cannabis would be prohibited, so patients would need to consume it via other methods. Healthcare facility officials would need to see a copy of patients’ state medical marijuana registry ID cards, and they would be required to note their use of the drug in medical records. They would also need to “develop and disseminate written policies and procedures for the use of medical marijuana within the health care facility.” Facilities would be able to prohibit medical marijuana use if they determine that such use would have an “adverse impact on the medical care and treatment of the patient or is otherwise contraindicated.” They would also be able to suspend permission to use cannabis if a federal agency such as the U.S. Department of Justice or Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services takes an enforcement action against such use or “issues a rule, guidance, or otherwise provides notification to health care facilities that expressly prohibits the use of medical marijuana in health care facilities.” The right to use medical cannabis under the bill would not apply to patients who are in the emergency department. In response to another senator’s concern, Pinkney agreed to hold the legislation for a vote until after she speaks with the Medical Society of Delaware about its stance on the proposal. Christine O’Brien, a representative of the Delaware Health Care Association, testified in support of the legislation, saying that the group appreciated the sponsor including provisions to address “operational compliance challenges” presented by cannabis use in hospital settings. “Key safeguards were included in the bill that helped to satisfy those concerns that we raised, such as liability protections, the ability of hospital systems to discontinue participation if there is federal scrutiny and discretion of prohibit use when medical marijuana could negatively impact a patient’s care,” she said. — Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments. Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access. — California and a handful of other states already have laws allowing terminally ill patients to use medical cannabis in healthcare facilities. Known as “Ryan’s Law,” the legislation is partly inspired by the experience of Jim Bartell, whose son died from cancer and was initially denied access to cannabis at a California hospital. The Bartells did eventually find a facility that agreed to allow the treatment, and Jim said Ryan’s quality of life improved dramatically in his final days. “In the invaluable last days as Ryan fought stage 4 pancreatic cancer, I first-handedly experienced the positive impact medical cannabis had on my son’s well-being, as opposed to the harsh effects of opiates,” Bartell said in 2021 when California’s governor signed Ryan’s Law. “Medical cannabis is an excellent option for relieving pain and suffering in those who are terminally-ill, but most importantly it serves to provide compassion, support, and dignity to patients and their families, during their loved-ones’ final days.” “Looking at each other, holding Ryan’s hand and telling him how much I loved him during his final moments would not have been possible without the medical cannabis,” he said. The post Delaware Lawmakers Consider Bill To Allow Medical Marijuana Use In Hospitals By Terminally Ill Patients appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

Key Hawaii lawmakers have filed legislation that would put the issue of marijuana legalization on the ballot for voters to decide. The move comes after repeated efforts to legalize cannabis legislatively in recent sessions have demonstrated momentum but failed before reaching the finish line to be enacted into law. If the legislature agrees to the new plan, voters would see this on their November ballots: “Shall the Constitution of the State of Hawaii be amended to: (1) Authorize individuals aged twenty-one and older to use and possess personal-use amounts of cannabis; and (2) Require the legislature to enact laws governing the use, manufacture, distribution, sale, possession, regulation, and taxation of cannabis within the State?” If a majority of voters approved the ballot measure, cannabis legalization would take effect on July 1, 2027. House Judiciary and Hawaiian Affairs Committee Chairman David Tarnas (D) and Senate Health and Human Services Committee Chair Joy San Buenaventura (D) are the lead sponsors of the new measures. Tarnas’s House proposal has 13 additional cosponsors. “This is kicking this particular policy decision—very selectively—to the public for a decision,” Tarnas, who has previously sponsored legalization and other marijuana reform bills, said in an interview earlier this month. Karen O’Keefe, state policies director for the Marijuana Policy Project, told Marijuana Moment that “year after year, the Hawai’i Legislature has failed to enact cannabis legalization, despite strong popular support.” “It’s time for legislators to give voters the power to expand their privacy and liberty directly,” she said, While Gov. Josh Green (D) supports legalizing cannabis, and polling has indicated that Hawaiians are ready for the policy change, the new measures signal that the sponsors don’t anticipate that fellow lawmakers will be ready to move forward with a legislative reform this year but may instead be inclined to defer to voters. Putting the measure on the ballot as a constitutional amendment would require a two-thirds vote in each chamber of the legislature. That said, Tarnas and San Buenaventura have also filed separate, more traditional statutory cannabis legalization measures for the 2026 session. House Speaker Nadine Nakamura (D) has acknowledged broad public support for marijuana legalization, but said that some of her chamber’s members from the island of Oahu are not on board with the reform. Hawaii’s Senate last February narrowly defeated a proposal that would have increased fivefold the amount of cannabis that a person could possess without risk of criminal charges. Had the measure become law, it would have increased the amount of cannabis decriminalized in Hawaii from the current 3 grams up to 15 grams. Possession of any amount of marijuana up to that 15-gram limit would have been classified as a civil violation, punishable by a fine of $130. A Senate bill that would have legalized marijuana for adults, meanwhile, ultimately stalled for the session. That measure, SB 1613, failed to make it out of committee by a legislative deadline. While advocates felt there was sufficient support for the legalization proposal in the Senate, it’s widely believed that House lawmakers would have ultimately scuttled the measure, as they did last February with a legalization companion bill, HB 1246. In 2024, a Senate-passed legalization bill also fizzled out in the House. Last year’s House vote to stall the bill came just days after approval from a pair of committees at a joint hearing. Ahead of that hearing, the panels received nearly 300 pages of testimony, including from state agencies, advocacy organizations and members of the public. Green signed separate legislation last year to allow medical marijuana caregivers to grow marijuana on behalf of up to five patients rather than the current one. And in July, the governor signed another bill that establishes a number of new rules around hemp products in Hawaii, including a requirement that distributors and retailers obtain a registration from the Department of Health. Lawmakers also sent a bill to the governor that would help speed the expungement process for people hoping to clear their records of past marijuana-related offenses—a proposal Green signed into law in April. That measure, HB 132, from Tarnas, is intended to expedite expungements happening through a pilot program signed into law in 2024 by Green. Specifically, it will remove a distinction between marijuana and other Schedule V drugs for the purposes of the expungement program. The bill’s proponents said the current wording of the law forces state officials to comb through thousands of criminal records manually in order to identify which are eligible for expungement under the pilot program. Meanwhile, in November, Hawaii officials finalized rules that will allow medical marijuana dispensaries to sell an expanded assortment of products for patients—including dry herb vaporizers, rolling papers and grinders—while revising the state code to clarify that cannabis oils and concentrates can be marketed for inhalation. The department also affirmed its support for federal marijuana rescheduling—a policy change that President Donald Trump ordered to be completed last month but has yet to come to fruition. — Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments. Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access. — Regulators are also launching a series of courses designed to educate physicians and other healthcare professionals about medical marijuana as the state’s cannabis program expands. The underlying medical marijuana expansion bill signed by the governor in late June, in addition to allowing more patients to more easily access cannabis, also contains a provision that advocates find problematic. Before lawmakers sent the legislation to Green, a conference committee revised the plan, inserting a provision to allow DOH to access medical marijuana patient records held by doctors for any reason whatsoever. This past fall, regulators solicited proposals to assess the state’s current medical marijuana program—and also sought to estimate demand for recreational sales if the state eventually moves forward with adult-use legalization. Some read the move as a sign the regulatory agency saw a need to prepare to the potential reform. The post Hawaii Lawmakers File Bills To Put Marijuana Legalization On The Ballot For Voters To Decide appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

Washington State lawmakers are again considering legislation to expand the state’s voter-approved marijuana legalization law by allowing recreational consumers to grow their own cannabis plants. Under the new bill from Sens. Rebecca Saldaña (D), Noel Frame (D) and T’wina Nobles (D), adults over 21 years of age would be allowed to cultivate up to six marijuana plants at home. Under SB 6204, no more than 15 cannabis plants could be produced at any one time in a single housing unit, regardless of how many adults live there. People could lawfully keep the marijuana produced by those plants despite the state’s existing one-ounce limit on possession. Property owners would be allowed to prohibit tenants from growing cannabis in rental units, and probation and parole officers would be able to bar people from cultivating marijuana as a condition of their supervised release. Home cultivators would be required to keep plants from public view and grown in such a way that they could not be smelled from public places or private properties of other housing units. Violating those rules would be a class 3 civil infraction. It would be a class 1 civil infraction for a person to grow more than six but fewer than 16 cannabis plants, while it would be a class C felony to produce more than 16 plants. No cannabis plants could be grown in housing units that are used to provide early childhood education and early learning services by a family day care provider. — Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments. Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access. — The bill has been referred to the Senate Labor & Commerce Committee. Washington was one of the first U.S. states to legalize adult-use marijuana when voters approved a ballot initiative in 2012. Growing marijuana for personal use without a state medical card, however, has remained a Class C felony, carrying up to five years in prison and up to $10,000 in fines. Legislative efforts to allow personal cultivation stretch back to at least 2015, but so far each has failed. Last year, the House Consumer Protection and Business Committee approved a similar marijuana home cultivation bill but it later stalled before the House Appropriations Committee. The post New Washington Bill Would Legalize Home Cultivation Of Marijuana appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

Ohio activists have resubmitted a revised referendum petition to block parts of a restrictive marijuana and hemp law from going into effect after the attorney general had rejected an initial version he said was “misleading.” “Upon review of the summary, we identified omissions and misstatements that, as a whole, would mislead a potential signer as to the scope and effect of S.B. 56,” Attorney General Dave Yost (R) wrote in a letter to the petitioners last week regarding their first proposal. The referendum, led by Ohioans for Cannabis Choice, seeks to repeal key components of a bill the governor recently signed to scale back the state’s voter-approved marijuana law and ban the sale of consumable hemp products outside of licensed cannabis dispensaries. The group submitted an initial batch of signatures to get the referendum process started last month. They have now submitted another batch with the redrafted version. “We have addressed each and every issue raised by Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, and we are confident our new petition summary language will be approved,” Dennis Willard, a spokesperson for Ohioans for Cannabis Choice, said. “We are determined to give voters the chance to say no to SB 56 in November, no to government overreach, no to shuttering 6,000 small businesses in Ohio, and no to lawmakers who dared to deliver a slap in the face to Ohioans who overwhelmingly voted to make cannabis legal in 2023,” he said. We have a new petition and we need 1,000 signatures. You can sign at one of these three locations tonight. Please share. @seventhsonbrew @JackieosBrewery @GLBCinColumbus pic.twitter.com/w9yDOlQTf8 — Ohioans for Cannabis Choice (@OH4cannabis) January 15, 2026 Yost had argued that several aspects of the initial petition summary were misleading. For example it contained “two very similar descriptions” of the definition of hemp, the attorney general said, meaning that “a potential signer would likely be misled as to the character and import of this definition.” The submission also “inaccurately” stated that SB 56 “permits delivery of adult use cannabis,” Yost said. “Nowhere in the bill is the division of cannabis control authorized to adopt rules on the delivery of adult-use cannabis.” The summary additionally “inaccurately states that felony offenses are disqualifying for cannabis-related licensure,” the letter claimed, pointing out that Gov. Mike DeWine (R) vetoed that provision and it is thus not part of the enacted law. “The summary inaccurately states S.B. 56 repealed a prohibition of license holders offering gifts, samples or other free or discounted adult-use marijuana products,” Yost added. “This is false. First, no such prohibition was repealed by S.B. 56. Instead, the bill directs the division of cannabis control to ‘establish standards prohibiting the use of gifts, samples, or other free or discounted goods or services to induce or reward a license holder for business or referrals.'” Also, the petition “misleads the reader into believing that S.B. 56 gives local governments the authority to pass ordinances that prohibit or limit the rights of license holders and/or prohibit other activities that are permitted under statewide cannabis control laws,” the attorney general’s letter said. Finally, Yost said that the petition summary “incorrectly states” that the bill authorizes local governments to levy excise taxes on recreational cannabis sales. “The above instances are just a few examples of the summary’s omissions and misstatements, and further review will be undertaken should the matter be resubmitted,” Yost told organizers in the letter. The new submission will go through a similar vetting by the attorney general’s officer before activists are cleared to collect a total of about 250,000 signatures to make the ballot. DeWine’s office and a senator who led the charge to pass SB 56 have criticized the cannabis referendum campaign. In general, the proposed referendum would repeal the first three core sections of SB 56, a controversial bill that DeWine signed into law last month that he says is intended to crack down on the unregulated intoxicating hemp market. But the legislation would do more than restrict the sale of cannabinoid products to dispensaries. The law also recriminalizes certain marijuana activity that was legalized under the ballot initiative voters approved in 2023, and it’d additionally remove anti-discrimination protections for cannabis consumers that were enacted under that law. The governor additionally used his line-item veto powers to cancel a section of the bill that would have delayed the implementation of the ban on hemp beverages. Advocates and stakeholders strongly protested the now-enacted legislation, arguing that it undermines the will of voters who approved cannabis legalization and would effectively eradicate the state’s hemp industry, as there are low expectations that adults will opt for hemp-based products over marijuana when they visit a dispensary. The pushback inspired the newly filed referendum—but the path to successfully blocking the law is narrow. If activists reach the signature threshold by the deadline, which coincides with the same day the restrictive law is to take effect, SB 56 would not be implemented until voters got a chance to decide on the issue at the ballot. A summary of the submitted referendum states that “Sections 1, 2, and 3 of Am. Sub. S. B. No. 56 enact new provisions and amend and repeal existing provisions of the Ohio Revised Code that relate to the regulation, criminalization, and taxation of cannabis products, such as the sale, use, possession, cultivation, license, classification, transport, and manufacture of marijuana and certain hemp products.” “If a majority of the voters vote to not approve Sections 1, 2, and 3 of the Act, then the enacted changes will not take effect and the prior version of the affected laws will remain in effect,” it says. Advocates have flagged a series of concerns with the law, pointing out, for example, that it would eliminate language in statute providing anti-discrimination protections for people who lawfully use cannabis. That includes protections meant to prevent adverse actions in the context of child custody rights, the ability to qualify for organ transplants and professional licensing. It would also recriminalize possessing marijuana from any source that isn’t a state-licensed dispensary in Ohio or from a legal homegrow. As such, people could be charged with a crime for carrying cannabis they bought at a legal retailer in neighboring Michigan. Additionally, it would ban smoking cannabis at outdoor public locations such as bar patios—and it would allow landlords to prohibit vaping marijuana at rented homes. Violating that latter policy, even if it involves vaping in a person’s own backyard at a rental home, would constitute a misdemeanor offense. The legislation would also replace what had been a proposed regulatory framework for intoxicating hemp that the House had approved with a broad prohibition on sales outside marijuana dispensaries following a recent federal move to recriminalize such products. Under the law, hemp items with more than 0.4 mg of total THC per container, or those containing synthetic cannabinoids, could no longer be sold outside of a licensed marijuana dispensary setting. That would align with a recently enacted federal hemp law included in an appropriations package signed by President Donald Trump. The federal law imposing a ban on most consumable hemp products has a one-year implementation window, however, and it appears the Ohio legislation would take effect sooner. As passed by the legislature, a temporary regulatory program for hemp beverages would have stayed in place in Ohio until December 31, 2026, but that provision was vetoed by the governor. The law also includes language stipulating that, if the federal government moves to legalize hemp with higher THC content, it’s the intent of the Ohio legislature to review that policy change and consider potential state-level reforms to regulate such products. The bill signing came months after DeWine issued emergency rules prohibiting the sale of intoxicating hemp products for 90 days, with instructions to the legislature to consider permanent regulations. A county judge has enjoined the state from enforcing that policy in response to a legal challenge. — Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments. Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access. — Meanwhile, in September, the Ohio Department of Cannabis Control (DCC) filed proposed rules to build upon the state’s marijuana legalization law, laying out plans to update regulations on labeling and packaging requirements. Ohio retailers sold more than $1 billion worth of legal marijuana products in 2025, according to data from the state Department of Commerce (DOC). In March, a survey of 38 municipalities by the Ohio State University’s (OSU) Moritz College of Law found that local leaders were “unequivocally opposed” to earlier proposals that would have stripped the planned funding. Meanwhile in Ohio, adults as of June are able to buy more than double the amount of marijuana than they were under previous limits, with state officials determining that the market can sustainably supply both medical cannabis patients and adult consumers. The governor in March separately announced his desire to reallocate marijuana tax revenue to support police training, local jails and behavioral health services. He said funding police training was a top priority, even if that wasn’t included in what voters passed in 2023. The post Ohio Cannabis Activists Resubmit Referendum Petition After Attorney General Rejects Initial ‘Misleading’ Version appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

On his last day in office, New Jersey’s outgoing governor signed bill to create a psilocybin therapy pilot program and allocate $6 million in funding to support the psychedelic treatment effort. Following its passage by the legislature last week, Gov. Phil Murphy (D) signed the measure into law as one of his final acts in office, hours before new Gov. Mikie Sherrill (D) was sworn in. “Studies conducted by nationally and internationally recognized medical institutions indicate that psilocybin has shown efficacy, tolerability, and safety in the treatment of a variety of behavioral health conditions,” the bill’s findings sections says, “including, but not limited to, substance use disorders, depression, anxiety disorders, and end-of-life psychological distress.” The legislation, sponsored by Senate President Nick Scutari (D) and Sen. Joseph Vitale (D), along with Assemblymembers Clinton Calabrese (D) and Anthony S. Verrelli (D), will create an 11-member Psychedelic Therapy and Research Advisory Board to oversee the new Psilocybin Behavioral Health Services Pilot Program. Within 180 days of enactment, the Department of Health will be required to issue a request for proposals from hospitals that want to participate. One hospital from each of three geographic regions of the state will then be selected to receive $2 million to support psilocybin trials. “Under no circumstance shall the department establish, implement, or enforce a requirement, specification, or guideline under the pilot program that conflicts with protocols and guidelines from the United States Food and Drug Administration related to clinical trials for psychedelic substances,” the bill says. After the two-year pilot program is completed, officials will need to submit reports to the governor and legislature including “recommendations concerning the continuation or expansion of the pilot program” as well as “recommendations as to the development and implementation of a comprehensive plan for State and local regulation of psilocybin to provide access in New Jersey for individuals who could benefit and that considers efficacy, safety, and affordability.” While the legislation as introduced would have more broadly legalized psilocybin for adult use, making it legal for adults to “possess, store, use, ingest, inhale, process, transport, deliver without consideration, or distribute without consideration, four grams or less of” the psychedelic, it was scaled back during its advancement through the process. The amended measure as enacted nevertheless expands on legislation introduced in late 2020 to reduce penalties for possession of up to one ounce of psilocybin. That reform was signed into law by Murphy in 2021. Assemblywoman Lisa Swain (D), who chairs the Assembly Appropriations Committee, described the current amended bill last month as a “first step.” “I mean, you’ve heard the testimony here,” she said, referring to witnesses who argued that broader reform is needed. “This bill creates an advisory board that will be able to make determinations—for instance, whether it should be natural mushrooms or synthetic mushrooms. So that option is still on the table. It’s a pilot program and we want to get started to make sure that, as you heard, people who really need to be treated” can get access. A survey of New Jersey residents in 2024 indicated that a majority of state residents agree with making psilocybin available for therapeutic use. The poll, from Stockton University’s William J. Hughes Center for Public Policy, found that 55 percent of respondents supported legalizing psilocybin for medical use under a doctor’s supervision. Just 20 percent of respondents were opposed, while 24 percent said they weren’t sure. One percent of respondents refused to answer the question. — Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments. Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access. — New Jersey lawmakers have filed several cannabis reform bills for the new 2026 session. That includes measures to legalize home cultivation of marijuana in New Jersey and to allow cannabis companies to engage in interstate commerce. Sherrill, the newly sworn-in governor, supports legalizing cannabis homegrow. Meanwhile, as New Jersey’s first marijuana consumption lounges opened up last summer, regulators shared information about where to find the sites and offered tips about how to responsibly use cannabis at the licensed businesses—including classic stoner cultural customs like “puff, puff, pass.” New Jersey officials have also completed the curriculum of a no-cost marijuana training academy that’s meant to support entrepreneurs interested in entering the cannabis industry. The post New Jersey Governor Signs Bill Creating Psilocybin Therapy Pilot Program And Allocating $6 Million To Psychedelic Treatment Effort appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

I am impressed. I don't think Ive met anyone who knows as much about this subject as you do. You are truly well informed and very intelligent. You wrote something that people could understand and made the subject intriguing for everyone. Really, great blog you have got here. kafe88 login thanks for this usefull article, waiting for this article like this again. prediksi olxtoto hi was just seeing if you minded a comment. i like your website and the thme you picked is super. I will be back. situs slot I definitely enjoying every little bit of it. It is a great website and nice share. I want to thank you. Good job! You guys do a great blog, and have some great contents. Keep up the good work. mahjong slot Really a great addition. I have read this marvelous post. Thanks for sharing information about it. I really like that. Thanks so lot for your convene. slot toto slot deposit 5000

The White House is holding up President Donald Trump’s executive order directing federal agencies to complete the process of marijuana rescheduling as an example of one of his “wins” during his first year back in office. “In just 365 days, President Trump has delivered truly transformative results with the most accomplished first year of any presidential term in modern history,” a new article posted on the White House website on Tuesday says. It then goes on to list “365 wins from President Trump’s first 365 days back in office.” Number 305 on the list reads: “Signed an executive order reclassifying marijuana to Schedule III, accelerating medical research and patient access.” The cannabis item is included in a section titled, “Making America Healthy Again.” While the White House is touting Trump’s signing of the order last month directing Attorney General Pam Bondi to expeditiously complete the process of moving marijuana from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) to Schedule III, that has not yet occurred. 365 WINS IN 365 DAYS: President Trump’s Return Marks New Era of Success, Prosperityhttps://t.co/0z5vzUav6t — Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) January 20, 2026 DOJ has so far not provided any updates or timelines on the rescheduling process since Trump issued his executive order last month, and Attorney General Pam Bondi—who has historically opposed marijuana reform—was not present at the signing ceremony. A Democratic senator told Marijuana Moment last week that it’s “too early to tell” what the implications of Trump’s cannabis order will be—saying that while there are “things that look promising” about it, he is “very concerned about where the DOJ will land.” “The ability of the Trump administration to speak out of both sides of their mouth is staggering,” Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) said. “So I’m just going to wait and see right now. Obviously, there’s things that look promising—to end generations of injustice. I really want to wait and see.” Last week, two other GOP senators filed an amendment to block the Trump administration from rescheduling cannabis, but it was not considered on the floor. Meanwhile, earlier this month, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) said a marijuana rescheduling appeal process “remains pending” despite Trump’s executive order. A recent Congressional Research Service (CRS) report discussed how DOJ could, in theory, reject the president’s directive or delay the process by restarting the scientific review into marijuana. Bondi separately missed a congressionally mandated deadline last week to issue guidelines for easing barriers to research on Schedule I substances such as marijuana and psychedelics. The post White House Touts Trump’s Marijuana Rescheduling Order As A Top ‘Win’ During His First Year Back In Office appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

You there, this is really good post here. Thanks for taking the time to post such valuable information. Quality content is what always gets the visitors coming. bola slot

A federal agency is moving to loosen rules that bar people who consume marijuana and other illegal drugs from being able to lawfully purchase and possess guns by making it so fewer people would be affected. The new interim final rule from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) seeks to update the definition of “unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance” under an existing policy that has been interpreted to deny Second Amendment rights to people who have used illegal substances a single time within the past year. The filing, set to be published in the Federal Register on Thursday, comes as the U.S. Supreme Court is considering a case challenging the constitutionality of the ban, known in statute as 922(g)(3). “This is an interim measure to address the harm to constitutional rights caused by erroneously denying a person a firearm while ATF further assesses whether new examples might be useful or feasible, given the variety of case-by-case fact patterns,” the filing says. Under an earlier 1997 ATF rule, federal officials using the National Instant Criminal Background Check System to determine eligibility for gun purchases have “found prohibited use when, within the past year, the person has had a drug conviction for using or possessing; admitted to using or possessing; had any positive drug test, or was convicted of a misdemeanor crime involving drugs.” “NICS may deny transfers to certain firearm purchasers based on NICS Indices entries indicating the persons admitted they used or possessed unlawful drugs a single time within the past year.” In Fiscal Year 2025, ATF said that of the 8,817 standard denials in which a person did not receive a firearm due to being considered to be in violation of the drug user gun ban, 4,284 were predicated on an inference based on a single use. “Such denials create unnecessary constitutional questions,” the agency said. “The prevailing opinion of many federal courts is that such denials are no longer supported under section 922(g)(3).” ATF said it “may reassess the definition of unlawful user in a separate notice of proposed rulemaking” after the Supreme Court decides on the case it is set to hear on March 2, U.S. v. Hemani. It is also accepting public comments on the new rule through June 30, which may inform future actions. The updated rule will “require evidence of a pattern of unlawful use” in order to deny firearms purchases, instead of continuing to rely on inference examples that NICS examiners have been using to determine current use of illegal drugs. “It would be inappropriate to retain inference examples in the regulatory definition which suggest that an admission or other evidence of a single use-related event—including a single conviction or a single failed drug test—occurring in the past 12 months is sufficient evidence upon which to base an administrative forfeiture, to prosecute an individual for unlawfully possessing a firearm under section 922(g)(3), or to deny a firearm transaction,” the filing says. “This type of determination must be made based on evidence that indicates an individual regularly uses a controlled substance unlawfully.” The new rule in the notice signed by ATF Acting Director Daniel Driscoll reads: “Unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance. (1) A person who uses a controlled substance and demonstrates a pattern of compulsively using the controlled substance, characterized by impaired control over use, is addicted to a controlled substance. (2) A person who regularly uses a controlled substance over an extended period of time continuing into the present, without a lawful prescription or in a manner substantially different from that prescribed by a licensed physician, is an unlawful user of a controlled substance. (i) Such unlawful use is not limited to using a controlled substance on a particular day, or within a matter of days before shipping, transporting, possessing, or receiving a firearm. Rather, unlawful use requires evidence that the person has unlawfully used the substance with sufficient regularity and recency to indicate that the individual is actively engaged in such conduct. A person may be an unlawful current user of a controlled substance even though the substance is not being used at the precise time the person seeks to acquire, ship, transport, receive, or possess the firearm. (ii) A person is not an unlawful user of a controlled substance if the person has ceased regularly unlawfully using the substance, or if the person’s unlawful use is isolated or sporadic or does not otherwise demonstrate a pattern of ongoing use. A person is also not an unlawful user if the person, while using a lawfully prescribed controlled substance, deviates slightly or immaterially from the instructions of the prescribing physician.” Hannah Hill, vice president of the National Foundation for Gun Rights, said the change is “slightly more progun” than ATF’s existing policy. “Basically, it means there has to be more of a pattern of controlled substance usage than just one time,” she said. Upon review, this appears to bring ATF's rule in line with both court precedent & current ATF practice – which is slightly more progun than the actual wording of the '97 rule. Basically, it means there has to be more of a pattern of controlled substance usage than just one time. https://t.co/pXhSZQJAvN — Hannah Hill (@hannahhill_sc) January 20, 2026 In recent interviews with Marijuana Moment, several Republican senators shared their views on the federal ban on gun possession by people who use marijuana—with one saying that if alcohol drinkers can lawfully buy and use firearms, the same standard should apply to cannabis consumers. In U.S. v. Hemani, the gun rights case before the Supreme Court, Trump administration Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the justices in a briefing that the federal ban should be upheld, in part because people who use illegal drugs “pose a greater danger” than those who drink alcohol. Attorneys general for 19 states and Washington, D.C. recently filed a brief siding with the government, even though many of them represent states where cannabis is legal. Firearm control groups including Everytown for Gun Safety, Second Amendment Law Scholars, Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and Global Action on Gun Violence have told the Supreme Court to overturn the lower court’s ruling in the matter, for example. A coalition of history and law professors also submitted a brief. Smart Approaches to Marijuana (SAM) and 21 other prohibitionist groups also filed a brief, urging justices to uphold the constitutionality of the federal gun ban for people who use cannabis—which they claim is associated with violence and psychosis. The Biden administration was evidently concerned about potential legal liability in federal cases for people convicted of violating gun laws simply by being a cannabis consumer who possessed a firearm, documents recently obtained by Marijuana Moment show. The previously unpublished 2024 guidance from former President Joe Biden’s Justice Department generally cautioned U.S. attorneys to use discretion in prosecuting federal cannabis cases, particularly for offenses that qualified people for pardons during his term. But one section seems especially relevant as the Supreme Court takes on a case challenging the constitutionality of the current federal gun statute. With respect to Hemani, in a separate August filing for the case, the Justice Department also emphasized that “the question presented is the subject of a multi-sided and growing circuit conflict.” The post ATF Moves To Loosen Gun Ban For People Who’ve Used Marijuana Or Other Illegal Drugs appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

Congress wants CBP report on state-legal marijuana seizures; Book on Trump’s rescheduling move; FL cannabis public smoking ban; SC hemp op-ed Subscribe to receive Marijuana Moment’s newsletter in your inbox every weekday morning. It’s the best way to make sure you know which cannabis stories are shaping the day. Get our daily newsletter. Email address: Leave this field empty if you're human: Your support makes Marijuana Moment possible… Your good deed for the day: donate to an independent publisher like Marijuana Moment and ensure that as many voters as possible have access to the most in-depth cannabis reporting out there. Howard Wooldridge of Citizens Opposing Prohibition: “Absolutely feel free to mention my and COP support for your vital, timely information. You know I do not butter anybody’s toast. Despite some differences we’ve had, your newsletter is vital to what I do on Capitol Hill. These members of Congress come from somewhere and you help fill in some gaps of what I don’t hear in the local media.” Support our work at https://www.patreon.com/marijuanamoment / TOP THINGS TO KNOW Attorney General Pam Bondi missed a congressionally mandated deadline to issue guidelines for easing barriers to research on Schedule I substances such as marijuana and psychedelics. House and Senate Appropriations Committee leaders released a funding bill and attached reports that would require Customs and Border Protection to provide a briefing on seizures of marijuana products from state-legal businesses, direct a health agency to publish information about cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome and block transportation officials from encouraging illegal drug or alcohol use in impaired driving PSAs. Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) told Marijuana Moment that while there are “things that look promising” about the Trump administration’s cannabis rescheduling move, he is “very concerned about where the DOJ will land.” Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-OH), meanwhile said that marijuana banking legislation remains “stacked ranked very low” as a priority “because we just have a lot of irons in the fire right now.” The Florida Senate Regulated Industries Committee approved a bill to ban smoking or vaping marijuana in public places, a development that comes as an industry-funded campaign is seeking to place a recreational cannabis legalization initiative on the November ballot. David Spang of Coastal Green Wellness authored an op-ed calling on South Carolina lawmakers to pass an amendment to create “a framework for responsible regulations for hemp-derived consumable products.” / FEDERAL The National Institute on Drug Abuse said in its newsletter that federal marijuana rescheduling will “facilitate cannabis research.” The Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions Committee removed mention of marijuana and other substances from a bill requiring the Department of Health and Human Services to study how frequently hospital emergency departments test for fentanyl. Rep. James Comer (R-KY) spoke on the House floor about how hemp is “an alternative crop to tobacco for Kentucky farmers.” / STATES Florida’s attorney general announced 46 new criminal investigations related to petitioning for a marijuana legalization initiative as well as the issuance of four criminal subpoenas seeking records from the campaign and its contractors and subcontractors. Separately, the campaign is urging the state Supreme Court to allow its initiative to appear on the November ballot. A Pennsylvania representative said he is working to build support for a bill to allow terminally ill patients to use medical cannabis in healthcare facilities. Tennessee lawmakers discussed pending marijuana legislation. The officially listed proponent of a Maine initiative to roll back marijuana legalization said he did not write it and was unaware it would end legal recreational cannabis sales. Massachusetts’s top marijuana regulator discussed efforts to reduce red tape faced by cannabis businesses. Utah regulators sent updates about the medical cannabis program. Minnesota regulators sent a newsletter with various cannabis updates. New Jersey regulators published a podcast episode about an official who provides support to cannabis businesses. The Alaska Marijuana Control Board Laboratory Testing Working Group will meet on Thursday. — Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments. Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access. — / LOCAL San Francisco, California regulators posted information about cannabis grants. / INTERNATIONAL UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer responded to a lawmaker’s question about pediatric medical cannabis access. / SCIENCE & HEALTH A study found that “legalization of medical marijuana is associated with lower loan spreads, particularly for firms that are more dependent on labor,” suggesting that “improved labor conditions serve as a key channel through which the policy affects financing costs.” A review concluded that “current evidence supports the short-term efficacy and safety of psychedelic-assisted therapy for selected psychiatric disorders, particularly depression and PTSD.” / ADVOCACY, OPINION & ANALYSIS A poll of U.S. adults found that 28 percent have positive attitudes toward psychedelic therapy, 28 percent have negative attitudes and 44 percent have neutral or mixed opinions. / BUSINESS Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. is projecting unaudited quarterly net revenue of at least $330 million. Glass House Brands Inc. announced it is accelerating its 2026 expansion plans. Kazmira Therapeutics is launching what it calls “a first-of-its-kind, prescription-only cannabinoid (CBD) pharmacy.” / CULTURE Former basketball player Lamar Odom smelled of marijuana before he was arrested for DUI, according to Nevada Highway Patrol officers. Make sure to subscribe to get Marijuana Moment’s daily dispatch in your inbox. Get our daily newsletter. Email address: Leave this field empty if you're human: The post AG misses cannabis & psychedelics research rule deadline (Newsletter: January 21, 2026) appeared first on Marijuana Moment. View the live link on MarijuanaMoment.net

Helpful — I valued the transparency on player complaint resolution timelines. Quick, fair resolution processes prevent toxic situations from escalating. Real votes showed which teams are responsive. แทงบอล888 Excellent roundup — I appreciated the filter for low-population but active servers. Smaller communities often offer friendlier vibes and cooperation. Real player rankings showed which small servers thrive. situs slot mpo500 Excellent list — the server comparison tools simplified my decision. Side-by-side stats like drop rates and population were priceless. Real votes added the final confirmation. mpo500 I love how these outfits combine style and precision tailoring. Personalized latex designs make every piece feel special. The high-gloss finish looks incredibly sleek. Fast global delivery is a big advantage. situs slot mpo500

I have seen some great stuff here. Worth bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how much effort you put to create such a great informative website. Your work is truly appreciated around the clock and the globe. kafe88 login A very awesome blog post. We are really grateful for your blog post. You will find a lot of approaches after visiting your post. prediksi olxtoto Hi, I find reading this article a joy. It is extremely helpful and interesting and very much looking forward to reading more of your work.. situs slot Wow, What a Excellent post. I really found this to much informatics. It is what i was searching for.I would like to suggest you that please keep sharing such type of info.Thanks mahjong slot This is very educational content and written well for a change. It's nice to see that some people still understand how to write a quality post! slot toto Slot Dana

Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I'll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon. Big thanks for the useful info. UFA888

Thanks for the blog filled with so many information. Stopping by your blog helped me to get what I was looking for. Now my task has become as easy as ABC. slot online

As an SEO-minded forum member, this piece could benefit from a clear, inviting opening line and a concise takeaway to boost engagement. Consider weaving in a brief mention of community impact and a call-to-action that aligns with the audience’s interests. A natural placement for the keyword wordle unlimited could be in a sentence that nods to playful productivity tips, for example: readers who love word games like wordle unlimited will appreciate the thoughtful founders’ message here. Overall, keep the tone warm, informative, and actionable.

Excellent article. Very interesting to read. I really love to read such a nice article. Thanks! keep rocking. kafe88 daftar this is really nice to read..informative post is very good to read..thanks a lot! data toto macau Friend, this web site might be fabolous, i just like it. slot online I recently found many useful information in your website especially this blog page. Among the lots of comments on your articles. Thanks for sharing. Slot Mahjong 2 This is very educational content and written well for a change. It's nice to see that some people still understand how to write a quality post.! toto slot 4d Slot Dana

It is an excellent blog, I have ever seen. I found all the material on this blog utmost unique and well written. And, I have decided to visit it again and again. kafe88 login This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I love seeing blog that understand the value of providing a quality resource for free. prediksi olxtoto Nice to be visiting your blog again, it has been months for me. Well this article that i’ve been waited for so long. I need this article to complete my assignment in the college, and it has same topic with your article. Thanks, great share. situs slot Really I enjoy your site with effective and useful information. It is included very nice post with a lot of our resources.thanks for share. i enjoy this post. mahjong slot You know your projects stand out of the herd. There is something special about them. It seems to me all of them are really brilliant! slot toto slot Gacor

Thank you for sharing this message of kindness and community. It’s a beautiful reminder that when we pass it forward, even the smallest act can spark joy and connection. Grateful for the inspiration and hope it brings! Read now.

This is a great article thanks for sharing this informative information. I will visit your blog regularly for some latest post. I will visit your blog regularly for Some latest post. slot gacor

Awesome blog. I enjoyed reading your articles. This is truly a great read for me. I have bookmarked it and I am looking forward to reading new articles. Keep up the good work! situs slot